Top Three Popular Posts

Friday, 6 November 2026

Cannabis in 19th Century India: The Princely State of Jammu and Kashmir

Based on the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission's report of 1893-94, this article includes: 

  • My overview of cannabis usage in the Jammu and Kashmir State of 1893-94
  • The Indian Hemp Drugs Commission's findings regarding the Kashmir State
  • Kashmir State Memorandum


Overview



The Kashmir valley was inhabited by humans from the paleolithic age, through the neolithic age till the present. This indicates that the Dravidian culture of the Harappan and Mohenjodaro civilizations would have also inhabited this region till the migration of the Indo-Aryan tribes in the Vedic period pushed these earlier inhabitants southwards and eastwards into the Indian sub-continent. It has a history of Buddhism, Shaivism, Vaishnavism, Sikhism and Islam associated with it. 

Wikipedia states that 'The Princely State of Kashmir and Jammu (as it was then called) was constituted between 1820 and 1858 and was "somewhat artificial in composition and it did not develop a fully coherent identity, partly as a result of its disparate origins and partly as a result of the autocratic rule which it experienced on the fringes of Empire." It combined disparate regions, religions, and ethnicities: to the east, Ladakh was ethnically and culturally Tibetan and its inhabitants practised Buddhism; to the south, Jammu had a mixed population of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs; in the heavily populated central Kashmir valley, the population was overwhelmingly Sunni Muslim, however, there was also a small but influential Hindu minority, the Kashmiri brahmins or pandits; to the northeast, sparsely populated Baltistan had a population ethnically related to Ladakh, but which practised Shi'a Islam; to the north, also sparsely populated, Gilgit Agency, was an area of diverse, mostly Shi'a groups; and, to the west, Punch was Muslim, but of different ethnicity than the Kashmir valley.' It states that 'In 1846, the region became part of the Dogra-ruled princely state of Jammu and Kashmir, under the paramountcy (or tutelage) of the British Crown. Dogra rule lasted until 1947, when the former princely state became a disputed territory, now administered by three countries: India, Pakistan, and the People's Republic of China.' It further states that 'Despite being in a majority the Muslims were made to suffer severe oppression under Hindu rule in the form of high taxes, unpaid forced labor and discriminatory laws. Many Kashmiri Muslims migrated from the Valley to Punjab due to famine and policies of Dogra rulers. The Muslim peasantry was vast, impoverished and ruled by a Hindu elite. The Muslim peasants lacked education, awareness of rights and were chronically in debt to landlords and moneylenders, and did not organize politically until the 1930s'.

Most of the information regarding cannabis in 19th century Jammu and Kashmir was provided to the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission by the Governors of this region and Muhammad Hayat Khan. Some amount of information was gathered from Dr. Royle's 'Fibrous Plants of India', 'Punjab Products' and Dr. Watt's 'Hemp or Cannabis Sativa'. The Hemp Commission did not do a detailed study in this region like it did in the British-controlled provinces where it gathered responses from numerous witnesses through its questionnaire and survey. In that sense, the information regarding cannabis in 19th century Jammu and Kashmir was scant like the information gathered from the other native states.

The Indian Hemp Drugs Commission's report of 1893-94 states that the cannabis found in Jammu and Kashmir was predominantly wild growth, with more abundant growth found in the higher altitudes of Kashmir, as compared to the lower-lying areas in Jammu. This area of abundant growth was part of the belt of wild growth that extended across the Himalayas from east to west at the time of the Hemp Commission's study. By the time of the study, it appears that wild natural growth could be found only in this Himalayan tract, whereas throughout the rest of India, as one moved from north to south to the tip of peninsular India, only cultivated cannabis was to be found, albeit quite extensively, even as the British colonists moved to stifle this cultivated growth of cannabis. The Hemp Commission reports that 'This much may be gathered, however, with tolerable certainty, that the growth in Jammu is not so abundant as in the more elevated tract of Kashmir. The tract of profuse growth in Kashmir mentioned by Muhammad Hayat Khan is Kashmir proper, extending from Baramula to Verinag and Shopayan. The country lying between Adhampur and Banhal in the Jammu province, as well as the jagirs of Bhaddarwah and Poonch, have also an abundant growth.' The Kashmir Memorandum states that 'It is abundant in Wantipora, Haripore, and Anantnag tahsils of the Anantnag district, and in the Nagam tahsil of the Srinagar District, growing on both banks of the river Jhelum and Arveni and Kaimu nallahs.' Commenting on the conditions required for wild growth to exist, and why this was found only in the Himalayan tract, and possibly only a few elevated regions in the rest of India, the Commission states that 'The plant appears to be very hardy when it is once well established, but it is clear from the distribution of the wild growth in India that the conditions of soil and climate under which it can attain full growth are limited.' 

This wild growth of cannabis present in Jammu and Kashmir appears to have been abundant enough to meet the needs of the people of this region, without them having to cultivate the plant as in the rest of India. The Hemp Commission reports that 'The Governor of Kashmir and Jammu and the Member of Kashmir State Council report that the plant is not cultivated. It appears that the wild growth is abundant enough, and develops the narcotic properties in sufficient degree to satisfy the wants of the people.' The variety of cannabis found in the Jammu and Kashmir region was predominantly Cannabis Sativa, referred to as the 'female' plant in most parts of India, and Talia in Kashmir. Cannabis Sativa L., or the 'male' plant, or industrial hemp as it is known as today, and Khatiya bhang in Kashmir, was not so common. Cannabis Sativa is used mainly for its narcotic properties whereas Cannabis Sativa L. is used mainly for its fiber to create various products that have practical applications. In this sense, Jammu and Kashmir reflects the characteristics of cannabis found throughout India in the 19th century, where cannabis was predominantly cultivated for its narcotic properties and only to a much smaller extent for its fiber. This similarity in characteristics of the varieties of cannabis found in Jammu and Kashmir and the varieties of cannabis found in the rest of India makes the Hemp Commission wonder if what is called wild growth may have seen human intervention at some point in the distant past which resulted in the predominance of Cannabis Sativa over Cannabis Sativa L. in the Himalayan tract. Considering that human had been using cannabis for its narcotic properties for tens of thousands of years in this region, it is quite possible that they played an active role in the eventual predominance of the 'female' plant over the 'male' plant. Of course, it is not just humans, but numerous species of birds, insects and animals that show a preference for the narcotic Cannabis Sativa over the industrial Cannabis Sativa L., and together all these species, along with favorable growing conditions, may have shaped the cannabis landscape in a such a way that the narcotic variety predominated in the wild growth in the Himalayan tracts of the Indian sub-continent.

It appears that the people of Jammu and Kashmir used the plant for both its narcotic properties as well as extracted the fiber for creating various products, samples of which were sent to an event called the Punjab Exhibition. Regarding the production of fiber from cannabis, the Kashmir Memorandum states that 'Four hundred maunds of fibre are annually produced, but, for reasons stated above, the total quantity of fibre in Sambat 1950 amounted to 160 maunds only.' The fall in production in Sambat 1950 as mentioned in the previous statement is attributed to heavy floods which also affected the consumption of cannabis, reducing it to nearly half in that year. This Cannabis Sativa L. or industrial hemp was also used as fuel in the Kashmir region. The Kashmir Memorandum states that 'Down the city on both banks of the river Jhelam wild hemp known as Kathiya bhang does not produce gard bhang (chura charas), and it is only used for its fibre and twigs for burning.. About 600 maunds of fibre is annually produced down the river and in the Utarmachipura and Sri Pratap Singhpura tahsils and ilaqa Magan of the Pattan Tahsil and Khinhama.' From this, it appears that it was primarily Cannabis Sativa L., or Khatiya bhang or industrial hemp that was cultivated in Kashmir, with narcotic cannabis sativa, or Talia bhang, being procured from the wild. 

Given the predominantly Islamic roots of the people of Jammu and Kashmir, we see that the form in which cannabis was primarily consumed there was as charas, or the cannabis resin. The leaves and flowers were exported to some extent to the Punjab Province whose natives preferred to call it bhang and consumed it primarily as a beverage. 

Throughout the Hemp Commission's report we see the utter confusion that was caused by the definition of ganja, bhang and charas by Dr. Prain, the botanist from Calcutta. He defined bhang as the leaves of the cannabis plant, ganja as the flowering heads and charas as the resin. By doing this, he split the cannabis plant into three and created divisions where none existed before. Almost all the witnesses to the Hemp Commission - comprising mainly of upper caste and upper class Hindus, British personnel and orthodox Muslims - agreed with Dr. Prain's definition, cementing the chaos that would eventually lead to it being embedded in the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act of 1985 in modern India, where the chaos continues to rise to new heights bewildering administrator and user. As I have stated repeatedly in numerous articles regarding cannabis in India, for the people of India who actually consumed cannabis - unlike these witnesses to the Hemp Commission who had almost no first hand knowledge or experience of cannabis but gathered their information from hearsay - the cannabis plant was just one drug which they called 'bhang', 'ganja' or 'charas' depending on their cultural and linguistic background. The people of the north-western regions of India predominantly referred to it as 'charas' given their linguistic roots in Urdu. The people of the northern and central regions of India predominantly referred to it as 'bhang' given their linguistic roots in Sanskrit. The people of the central and southern regions predominantly referred to it as 'ganja' given their linguistic roots in Tamil (or proto-Dravidian as the finicky linguists prefer to call it). The Canarese people called it 'bhangi' while people of Punjab and Sind called it 'gundia bhang'. The fact of the matter is that, irrespective of what name people called it by, what these people consumed was the narcotic Cannabis Sativa, including all three parts of the cannabis plant - its leaves, flowering heads and resin. We see all this further corroborated in the Hemp Commission's report on cannabis in Kashmir, with the Hemp Commission attributing the confusion in names to the people of Kashmir who had been using it for thousands of years, instead of understanding that the Commission itself, and Dr. Prain, were chiefly responsible for creating these divisions in the cannabis plant and the people who used it through their ignorance. In its report on Kashmir, the Hemp Commission says 'The Governor of Kashmir Kashmir gives an account in which the names of the three drugs are confused. He says first: "Almost all wild hemp, which is called talia in the Punjab, and is generally female plant in the above-mentioned tahsils, is used for the preparation of ganja locally known by name gard bhang (chura charas)." And further on— "The leaves of the hemp plant are trodden under foot, and cleaned by sieves to prepare gard bhang, and the process is continued until the leaves are reduced to powder and seed separated." This describes the preparation of bhang, pure and simple; but apparently this article is known by the three names—ganja, gard bhang, or chura charas. And "it would appear that this is the stuff which is occasionally smoked. Fakirs and a few Muhammadans and Pandits of the Srinagar city and towns smoke gard bhang (churn charas)........................ The total number of persons who do smoke ganja is, etc". Another informant says: "Charas is prepared in the capital cities and is termed garda," and he does not know if bhang is prepared. The preparation of garda is described, and finishes with the reduction of the material to a "resinous powder." The manufacture of garda or charas by the method given in the "Punjab Products" is not described by either of the only three informants. It is probable that charas is made by a further elaboration from the garda charas spoken of above which is practically bhang powdered to a state of more than common fineness, and that ganja is a name borrowed from India without any correct idea of its meaning beyond that it signifies the female plant. It may be noted that the price of garda bhang, three pice per tola, given in the Governor of Kashmir's report, is very high for simple bhang, and seems to indicate that the article is more like charas.' This confusion created by Dr. Prain, the Hemp Commission and the Indian upper castes and upper classes of Vaishnavites, orthodox Muslims, Christians, Jains and Buddhists is no trivial matter. The ignorant and imbecile Indian upper castes and upper classes used this confusion to claim that the bhang they consumed as a beverage was harmless and even beneficial while the ganja that India's majority - its lower castes and classes, indigenous communities, spiritual mendicants and the poorest sections of society consumed (smoked) - was harmful and evil. These ignorant upper castes and upper classes maligned charas as equally harmful, based on the sole reason that cannabis resin was primarily imported from Muslim countries to the north-west of India and consumed largely by Muslims. The NDPS Act states today that 'bhang' is legal, while 'ganja' and 'charas' are illegal. A large quantity of charas in one's possession can even attract the death penalty under the NDPS Act. So we see the ignorance and the caste, linguistic and religion based discrimination deeply embedded in India's drug laws itself. It is used by the ruling classes and castes as a weapon to target and oppress those who do not belong to their clique, even though the people they oppress have been around far longer than them and have used cannabis far longer than them. We do not see any such absurd confusion in modern western countries and US states where cannabis has been legalized for medical and adult recreational use. Cannabis products are simply classified as edibles, flower and resin which map directly to the bhang, ganja and charas of the Hemp Commission and NDPS Act, without any legal distinction between the three.

Reporting on the feasibility of the entire prohibition of charas in India, the Hemp Commission wrote that 'Charas is practically a foreign article. Small amounts are imported from Nepal and Gwalior, but they may be left out of the account. The bulk comes from Yarkand through the Himalayan passes, or to a much smaller degree from other parts of Central Asia through the routes on the frontier of Afghanistan. It would not be a very difficult matter to stop these imports, though the co-operation of the Kashmir Darbar would be necessary in regard to Yarkand charas. It may, therefore, be accepted that the supply of charas might be cut off without much difficulty, though, as this article forms the principal import from Yarkand, the prohibition of charas would paralyse, if not extinguish, the trade with this country.' In its report, regarding the import of charas into the Punjab Province, the Hemp Commission states that 'The charas having arrived at Leh, and having apparently passed into the hands of Indian traders, is taken to the Punjab by two routes, via Kashmir and viá Kulu. The ganja, gard bhang, or chura charas manufactured in Kashmir is all consumed locally; none is exported to the Punjab (Kashmir Governor's Memorandum). The Kashmir authorities take precautions to see that the Yarkand charas passes through with bulk unbroken, and they levy duty on any that may be sold in Srinagar. The import by this route may be roughly stated at 500 maunds. Six or seven times as much is imported direct through Kulu to Hoshiarpur, and during the last three years the amount has grown considerably. The figures for the last three years are— Maunds. 1890-91 2,201 1891-92 3,242 1892-93 3,932. The figures quoted by the Excise Commissioner from the Provincial Reports of external trade show that the Kabul route is also used for the import of charas, but no imports were apparently registered in 1890-91 and 1891-92. In discussing the value of these figures, the Excise Commissioner remarks that no drug is shewn as coming across the western frontier (from Sewestan) or the northwestern (from Bajaur) except that from Kabul, while there is undoubtedly a certain amount of import trade with the Derajat and Hazara. This implies that to the west of the Kashmir route there are several roads from Hazara round to the Sind frontier by which charas enters the Punjab.' 

At the time of the Hemp Commission's study, the zamindars leased out land to cultivators who cultivated not just industrial hemp for fiber and fuel, but also seem to have exercised control over the wild hemp that grew on these lands. These lessees appear to have had monopoly over setting up of retail outlets from where both types of cannabis was sold. A limit of 5 tolas of ganja existed for sale to an individual. No price limits were fixed on sale of these articles. All this indicates regulation of cannabis, which leads me to think that these regulatory measures came into being with the British who controlled cannabis in Kashmir through the zamindars. With wild growth being present in abundance, one wonders what sort of control could have been achieved to prevent an individual from accessing this wild growth directly instead of having to go to the retail outlets to procure it. The only way to force the individual to procure his cannabis from the retail outlets would have been to eliminate the wild growth in open spaces, prosecute individuals for procuring it from anywhere other than the retail outlets and to limit this so-called wild growth to lands owned by zamindars, effectively bringing what was freely available in nature under government control. Such measures would surely have hit the poorest sections of society the hardest. Confirming that these oppressive measures had already been put in place at the time of the Hemp Commission's study in 1893-94, we see the Kashmir Memorandum stating that 'Illicit sale to, and possession of gard bhang by, consumers in excess of the maximum amount are now generally dealt with on the criminal side under the State Penal Code for disobedience of rules duly promulgated. The rules are, however, defective and make no provision for prosecuting a man manufacturing ganja without a license or destroying the wild hemp plant, or for other similar cases, or binding the lessee to keep up register of produce of the drugs and sale. Framing of the new rules as more effective preventive measures for such purposes is under consideration.' As we saw in the rest of India, when rights for sale were taken away from the general public and placed in the hands of a few licensees, these individuals became a part of the administrative preventive mechanism and turned informers for the authorities against anybody who tried to operate outside the regulatory measures since it directly ate into the revenues of the licensees. The charas that was imported from Yarkand mainly for the Punjab Province was allowed to pass through Kashmir only if it remained sealed. If the packaging was opened and part of the charas was sold in Kashmir, the excise authorities were entitled to a duty on it. The Kashmir Memorandum states that 'The drug being usually leased, lessee makes his own arrangements for prevention of the illicit sale, as he does for the control of the growth of the plant. The contractor of duty on custom and octroi also in his own interest has supervision on the Yarkand charas to see that it passes the country sealed intact, as, if sold in the city, he is entitled to duty on the same.' It is reported that whatever ganja was produced for retail sale was sold entirely indicating a high demand for it. This again indicates that much of the wild growth in open spaces had been exterminated by the administration, forcing the people to seek it in the retail outlets. Also there appears to have been no problem of smuggling of this ganja produced in Kashmir to other places. The reason cited is that it was considered inferior to the ganja available in neighboring provinces like Punjab and the North-Western provinces. I do not think there is much truth in this stated reason. My thinking is that with regulatory measures there was just not enough ganja available to meet local needs let alone smuggle it to Punjab and the North-Western Provinces where there was similar abundant local growth of ganja. Besides, the Punjab and North-Western Provinces also imported a large amount of charas from Yarkand and Nepal. In effect, with the advent of the British, cannabis was taken out of the hands of the people and placed firmly in the hands of the zamindars and their lessees, or in other words, the upper-classes and upper-castes as it had been done throughout India. The Kashmir Memorandum states that 'Higher up the river in the three tahsils of the Anantnag district and in the Nagam tahsil of the Srinagar district the hemp plant is cut by the zemindars of the neighbouring villages in the month of Kartik, lessee on behalf of the State, when hemp and manufacture of ganja are auctioned, receiving leaves of the plant in full and half of the fibre, the rest half of the fibre and the twigs going to the zemindars in lieu of their wages.'

The upper-caste and upper-class narrative that took cannabis out of the hands of the people of India can also be seen here in Kashmir. We see in the Kashmir Memorandum, the upper-caste and upper-class narrative that ganja was consumed only by the lowest classes and castes and bad characters where it states that 'The consumers are generally of low classes, Muhammadan and Hindu fakirs and a few notoriously bad characters'. We see the Kashmir Memorandum stating that 'The use of the hemp drug as a habit is doubtless injurious mentally and physically, but there are other stimulants which are in no way less injurious than these drugs. The use of bhang for drinking, which is in no way stimulant, is of course most injurious, making the consumers lazy, coward, and senseless when taken in excess.'  This labeling of ganja as harmful, and of bhang as even more harmful shows that the Kashmir memorandum was written by an orthodox Muslim and not an upper-caste Hindu. The author of the Kashmir Memorandum was confident that given the small number of cannabis users in the State, they would present no political danger if it was prohibited. The total number of consumers in the entire Kashmir state were estimated to be 2500 out of a population of about than 9,50,000. This, to me, indicates a gross under-estimation of the number of cannabis consumers, as has been done throughout India in order to downplay the extent of use and the importance of it, and to thus push for its increasing regulation and eventual prohibition. In my estimate, easily around 30% of the adult male population of Kashmir would have been cannabis consumers, with the percentage being as high as 50% among the labouring classes and 75% among the spiritual mendicants. But then, the cannabis communities were voiceless and powerless during the entire Hemp Commission's study, as they remain today, and whatever false narratives were created by the upper-castes and upper-classes enabled the British to practically eliminate it without any resistance, resulting in the entire population of India - upper-castes, lower-castes, outcastes - being deprived of the divine herb.

Today, the modern state of Jammu and Kashmir has been cleaved into three union territories - Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh - by the upper caste Vaishnavites who form the ruling BJP at the federal level in India through the abrogation of Article 370 of the Indian Constitution in August 2019. The discrimination that these upper caste Vaishnavites practiced against the Muslims with regard to the form in which they consumed cannabis - as resin or charas - is one of the underlying factors for reducing Jammu and Kashmir from a state to union territories under the direct control of a central-government-appointed Lieutenant-Governor. Jammu and Kashmir have been for centuries the gateway through which charas was imported into India from Yarkand, mainly to be consumed in the Punjab and North-Western Provinces, while a small amount found its way into the hands of the upper classes in the rest of India, mainly Bengal, Sind and the Hyderabad State. 

The splitting of these regions into union territories under direct control of the central government in 2019 was aimed at disrupting the flow of charas into India from Pakistan and Afghanistan as it had been happening for centuries. Why all this was done can be gauged from the Hemp Commission's report which states that 'The traffic in charas from Leh through Srinagar has been noticed in connection with the Punjab imports. It would seem that the goods do not ordinarily change hands or break bulk in Kashmir.'  Even more importantly, it was to secure and ensure a smooth path for opium flowing into and out of India through these regions. Opium, if you are not aware, is the drug of the Indian upper-castes and upper-classes across all religions, just like it was the favorite drug of the British colonists. The production and trafficking of opium, legal and illegal, significantly finances the BJP and serves as a key raw material for the opioid industry that forms the backbone of India's synthetic pharmaceutical industry - another of the chief financers of the BJP government. India is the world's largest producer of legal opium and the world's third largest producer of illegal opium. This is the legacy that the British left for India after systematically killing its cannabis culture. The Vaishnavite upper-castes and upper-classes who worked faithfully for the British colonists and aided them in killing the spiritual herb, medicine and intoxicant of India's people, and helped the British replace it with opium and synthetic pharmaceuticals have further tightened control over things in their role of opium producers and peddlers for the elites of the world, especially the British, Russians, Americans and Europeans. Through the money gained from funding by the opioid industry and synthetic pharmaceutical industry, the BJP in recent times has gained political control over not just Jammu and Kashmir and Leh-Ladakh in the north-west but also Assam, Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh and Bengal in the north-east and Uttar Pradesh in the north so as to ensure that opium trade proceeds smoothly between India, Afghanistan, Pakistan, China and Myanmar. While the British turned the Central Provinces, the Central India Agency, the Rajputana Agency, Assam and Baroda  States into opium cultivation regions in the 19th century after exterminating cannabis, the Indian upper-castes and upper-castes have, since so-called independence in 1947, continued where the British left off with the modern states of Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh being the primary source of opium production and Jammu, Kashmir, Leh-Ladakh, Assam, Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh, Bengal, Gujarat and Maharashtra being the gateways for the flow of opium into and out of India. While sustaining and ramping up its opium production and trafficking, the central government also ensures that the cannabis culture does not raise its head as this is the biggest threat to its opium obsession. Of course, what the BJP is doing today is continuing what the Congress and Janata Dal governments also did from 1947, being themselves in the control of the Indian upper-castes and classes, but more blatantly and more openly. The spiel of threats from across the border - Pakistan and China - and the anti-Muslim myths and narratives through the film industry, social media, television and print - funded largely by the upper-castes who run the opium and synthetic pharmaceutical industries and also fund the BJP - keep an ignorant India hypnotized while Siva and his beloved ganja and the communities that use them remain under ever-increasing oppression. Occasionally, the government launches a few cosmetic initiatives like heroin busts in Gujarat and Mumbai and fastidious-sounding campaigns like 'Operation Trident' in the north-east, 'Drug-free India', etc. These are all most likely targeting competitors that the upper-caste opium peddlers view as a threat, and another gimmick to portray to the ignorant majority of India that the government works for the people and not the upper-castes, opium and synthetic pharmaceutical industry. 

Yarkand, a predominantly Uyghur settlement today, formed part of the ancient Silk Route and was a Buddhist Kingdom for a long time. It is now part of Communist China, much like Tibet. Just as India has reduced Kashmir into a conduit for opium, the Chinese have reduced Yarkand into a conduit for opium. Together both these countries - India and China -, through their love, greed and addiction to opium, and in order to cater to the opium addiction of Britain, Europe and Russia, have killed the trade of possibly the finest charas in the world, which originated in Yarkand and replaced it with opium. 

Jammu and Kashmir joined the Indian union under a treaty signed by its ruler, Raja Hari Singh, with the union government of India. It was accorded a special status along with states in the north-east like Nagaland, which enabled it to maintain a certain amount of autonomy including restrictions on the purchase of land by persons from outside the state. This offered some amount of protection for the people and the natural resources of these states from being overrun by the destructive economic development that was being unleashed across the rest of the country by the ruling Hindu upper-castes and upper-classes. In the larger context of India, the Muslim population of Jammu and Kashmir form a minority as do the tribal communities of the north-eastern states that were confronted by a similar situation. Throughout the existence of Jammu and Kashmir, the Hindu upper-castes and classes of India spun the narrative that having privileges made Jammu and Kashmir a hot-bed of anti-nationalism and terrorism. When Jammu and Kashmir's statehood was removed in 2019 and it was bifurcated into union territories, the Hindu upper castes and upper classes all over India celebrated the move by the central government. The central government lost no time in moving into the former state and acquiring land and natural resources. Terror attacks were reported that justified the entry of the army into the state and its continued presence till date. Whether these terror attacks were staged by the union government by itself or in conjunction with Pakistan's military government remains unknown. The union government uses this threat to national security to justify the presence of the army in the state. But when one looks at the picture, it can quite easily be that army is in Jammu and Kashmir to ensure that the union government of India's (and Pakistan's military government's), legal and illegal opium trade remains unaffected, and cannabis does not take roots again even as the people reel under opioid addiction. Despite the Supreme Court of India setting repeated timelines for the restoration of Jammu and Kashmir's statehood, and repeated demands from the elected democratic government of Jammu and Kashmir demanding the restoration of statehood, the union government of India continues to keep it divided and keep the army in Jammu and Kashmir, creating propaganda about terrorism through its control over the media, television and the film industry, sponsored by the Vaishnavite upper-castes and upper-classes. The governments of Jammu and Kashmir are also responsible for this situation to a good extent, because when they were in power they cozied up to the right-wing BJP, enabling it to make inroads into the state. The elected democratic governments of Jammu and Kashmir have comprised of orthodox upper-caste and upper-class Muslims who think no differently from the Hindu upper-castes and upper-classes of the rest of India, as can be seen from the narrative in the Kashmir Memorandum furnished by orthodox Muslims working closely with the British, compromising the welfare of the people and the state in favor of the opium trade, extolling that cannabis is evil and harmful and forbidden by the scriptures while ensuring an environment where the legal and illegal trade of opium can thrive. The understanding that Siva and Allah are one and that, therefore, cannabis is as beloved to Allah as it is to Siva, is something that the rulers of Jammu and Kashmir refuse to acknowledge or remain ignorant of, oppressing the people of Jammu and Kashmir, especially its spiritual mendicants, working classes, indigenous communities and the poorest sections of society.

At one point in time, in the not-too-distant past, Jammu and Kashmir was probably home to some of the finest landraces of cannabis found anywhere in the world. The systematic extermination of these land races starting from the time of the British have surely eliminated nearly all of them. The priceless value that these land races offered to humanity and other living species will probably remain forever unknown. We saw from the Hemp Commission's report that cannabis was used quite extensively for its fiber and as fuel. Today, while countries like China, the US and France, have invested heavily in industrial cannabis, Jammu and Kashmir remains in the doldrums. The introduction of cannabis for industrial purposes - as biofuels, textiles and fabrics, paper, footwear, construction, agricultural crop, animal feed, nutrition, etc. - is the only possible viable solution for the Kashmir region to adopt a renewable, sustainable strategy to protect its beautiful but fragile environment. The introduction of cannabis for intoxication and medicine is the only way that the people and other living beings in the state can be saved from the epidemic of opium, methamphetamine and synthetic pharmaceuticals that is wrecking humans, animals, birds, insects and nature in general in this state while fueling and financing the forces that oppress the state. This step will make Jammu and Kashmir develop sustainable tourism at levels never dreamed of before as people from all over the world will flock here to enjoy some of the finest cannabis in one of the most beautiful regions of the world. Even though control over the Kashmir region is firmly in the hands of the Indian government, they have not been able to completely kill the charas trade in India, even though they sincerely wish to do so for no other reasons than out of spite for the Muslim and in order to protect the opium trade. As with ganja in the rest of India, charas has only moved underground into the black market where it finances and strenthens the criminal organizations and terror networks that the Indian government claims to be fighting but is secretly supporting in return for funding the ruling political parties. Complete legalization of cannabis will enable India to not only restore trade with Afghanistan and possibly even Yarkand for charas, but may even enable Jammu and Kashmir to produce its own charas of high quality that could be exported to the rest of the world.Through the introduction of cannabis for industry, medicine and intoxication will bring sustainable economic development to the region, creating jobs, introducing sustainable agriculture, and raising the general well-being of the people and healing the stress and trauma that the region has endured for nearly two centuries due to the unscrupulous forces that eye Kashmir with greed and lust. Jammu and Kashmir is particularly vulnerable to the catastrophic effects of climate change, having already witnessed floods, reduced snowfall, water shortages and rising temperatures that have caused great damage to the region. According to Hindu mythology, the entire Kashmir Valley was once a lake. In the last few years, the government of Jammu and Kashmir have started exploring the feasibility of legalizing cannabis for medical and industrial purposes, most likely driven by the havoc that opium is wrecking with public health and unsustainable fossil-fuel-based industries on the environment. How the timing of these initiatives line up with the pressure exerted by the union government on the state is not known to me, but I theorize that it may have unleashed a fresh round of anti-Kashmir propaganda, staged terrorism and counter-terrorism missions and tighter control over the state from the center through the army, its criminal organizations, its media machinery and political representatives around the same time that the state announced its plans to legalize cannabis for industrial and medical purposes. For the people of Kashmir, it is most important to recognize this as proof that they are on the right path and to continue even more strongly along this path to liberate and save themselves from their oppressors... Legalized cannabis for all purposes will significantly counter and reduce nature's backlash in this region. Kashmir, often described as paradise on earth, about which Led Zeppelin sang - 'Oh, let the sun beat down upon my face, with stars to fill my dream. I am a traveler of both time and space to be where I have been. To sit with elders of a gentle race this world has seldom seen. Who talk of days for which they sit and wait. When all will be revealed...' - now stands at the brink of turning to hell through the greed of the people who have been elected by the people of the state and India to manage it. Only the divine herb of Allah offers hope for freeing its people from the shackles that they find themselves and restoring the state to its past glory... The same goes for Leh and Ladakh...



The Indian Hemp Drugs Commission's findings

THE EXISTENCE, PREVALENCE, AND CHARACTER OF THE SPONTANEOUS GROWTH

Kashmir.
81. Information regarding Kashmir is derived from memoranda by the Governors of Kashmir and Jammu and Muhammad Hayat Khan, Member of the Kashmir State Council. According to the last-named authority, the spontaneous growth in Jammu resembles in its character and the localities it affects the growth in the plains of the Punjab. He does not appear, however, to have any very exact idea of the latter growth; for he places many localities on the same footing, in some of which the growth is common, and in others scanty or even wanting. This much may be gathered, however, with tolerable certainty, that the growth in Jammu is not so abundant as in the more elevated tract of Kashmir. The tract of profuse growth in Kashmir mentioned by Muhammad Hayat Khan is Kashmir proper, extending from Baramula to Verinag and Shopayan. The country lying between Adhampur and Banhal in the Jammu province, as well as the jagirs of Bhaddarwah and Poonch, have also an abundant growth. 

82. The memorandum of the Kashmir Governor mentions two kinds of wild growth which appear to have somewhat distinct characters. The growth called talia consists of the female plant, and is found in the Anantnag district and the Nagam tahsil of the ranges. It may very well be doubted if without these aids the plant would long survive in the low country under the vicissitudes of the Indian climate and seasons. The plant appears to be very hardy when it is once well established, but it is clear from the distribution of the wild growth in India that the conditions of soil and climate under which it can attain full growth are limited.


EXTENT OF CULTIVATION, AND ITS TENDENCY TO INCREASE OR DECREASE.

148. The Governor of Kashmir and Jammu and the Member of Kashmir State Council report that the plant is not cultivated. It appears that the wild growth is abundant enough, and develops the narcotic properties in sufficient degree to satisfy the wants of the people.


METHODS OF CULTIVATION AND MATTERS CONNECTED THEREWITH.

Kashmir.
217. The State report would show that there is no cultivation in Kashmir. Dr. Royle's "Fibrous Plants of India" and the references to the hemp plant in "Punjab Products" have been consulted without finding any definite statement to contradict this information. In the latter work both the bhang and "fibre" sent from Kashmir and Ladakh to the Punjab Exhibition are mentioned, but they may very well have been the produce of the wild growth. Dr. Watt refers in his "Hemp or Cannabis sativa" to cultivation of the plant in Kashmir, but without mentioning his authority. Dr. Royle's abstract of information at page 327 states: "All along the Himalayas, that is, in Nepal, in Kumaon, in Garhwal, and up to the newly acquired hills of the Punjab, at elevations of from 3,000 and 4,000 to 7,000 feet hemp is cultivated by the hillmen." Beyond this point westward his information does not go. There is a curious statement by the Governor of Kashmir that "almost all wild hemp, whch is called talia in the Punjab, and is generally female plants in the above-mentioned tahsils, is used for the preparation of ganja locally known by name gard bhang (chura charas)." The meaning is not clear; but the preponderance of the female plants, if it is the fact, indicates either some peculiarity in the environment of the plant in these regions or tending by man.


PREPARATION OF THE RAW DRUGS FROM THE CULTIVATED AND WILD PLANT

Kashmir.
271. The Governor of Jammu reports that neither ganja nor charas are made there, but only bhang. The Governor of Kashmir Kashmir gives an account in which the names of the three drugs are confused. He says first: "Almost all wild hemp, which is called talia in the Punjab, and is generally female plant in the above-mentioned tahsils, is used for the preparation of ganja locally known by name gard bhang (chura charas)." And further on— "The leaves of the hemp plant are trodden under foot, and cleaned by sieves to prepare gard bhang, and the process is continued until the leaves are reduced to powder and seed separated." 

This describes the preparation of bhang, pure and simple; but apparently this article is known by the three names—ganja, gard bhang, or chura charas. And "it would appear that this is the stuff which is occasionally smoked. Fakirs and a few Muhammadans and Pandits of the Srinagar city and towns smoke gard bhang (churn charas)........................ The total number of persons who do smoke ganja is, etc". Another informant says: "Charas is prepared in the capital cities and is termed garda," and he does not know if bhang is prepared. The preparation of garda is described, and finishes with the reduction of the material to a "resinous powder." The manufacture of garda or charas by the method given in the "Punjab Products" is not described by either of the only three informants. It is probable that charas is made by a further elaboration from the garda charas spoken of above which is practically bhang powdered to a state of more than common fineness, and that ganja is a name borrowed from India without any correct idea of its meaning beyond that it signifies the female plant. It may be noted that the price of garda bhang, three pice per tola, given in the Governor of Kashmir's report, is very high for simple bhang, and seems to indicate that the article is more like charas.


TRADE AND MOVEMENT OF THE HEMP DRUGS

Kashmir.
333. The whole of the ganja or gard bhang or chura charas which is prepared in Kashmir, about 70 maunds, is consumed locally. A considerable quantity of bhang is carried away from Jammu into the Punjab. The quantity is not ascertainable. It appears to be gathered near the Punjab frontier. The traffic in charas from Leh through Srinagar has been noticed in connection with the Punjab imports. It would seem that the goods do not ordinarily change hands or break bulk in Kashmir.


EXTENT OF USE AND THE MANNER AND FORMS IN WHICH THE HEMP DRUGS ARE CONSUMED

Kashmir and Nepal.
408. In Kashmir and Nepal the wild plant furnishes the whole, or a very large share, of the consumption - a fact which renders useless for present purposes the figure of production given in the Kashmir evidence, and of import from Bengal into Nepal which can be derived from the Bengal statistics.


SYSTEMS OF THE NATIVE STATES.

States in the Himalayan tract where the plant grows wild.
697. Kashmir apparently produces no charas properly so called, and all the charas which comes to the Punjab through Kashmir is accounted for under the Punjab system of registration.




KASHMIR STATE MEMORANDUM.

 

1. Cultivation of hemp does not prevail in Kashmir. 

2. The hemp plant, however, grows spontaneously throughout Kashmir proper. 

3. It is abundant in Wantipora, Haripore, and Anantnag tahsils of the Anantnag district, and in the Nagam tahsil of the Srinagar District, growing on both banks of the river Jhelum and Arveni and Kaimu nallahs. 

4. The growth of wild hemp is ordinarily dense. Almost all wild hemp which is called Talia in the Punjab, and is generally female plant in the above-mentioned tahsils, is used for the preparation of ganja locally known by name gard bhang (chura charas). 

5. The total quantity of gard bhang annually manufactured in ordinary years is about 70 maunds, but in the year Sambat 1950 the total production of ganja amounted to about 35 maunds, the hemp plant having been considerably damaged by the recent flood. 

6. Four hundred maunds of fibre are annually produced, but, for reasons stated above, the total quantity of fibre in Sambat 1950 amounted to 160 maunds only. 

7. Down the city on both banks of the river Jhelam wild hemp known as Kathiya bhang does not produce gard bhang (chura charas), and it is only used for its fibre and twigs for burning. 

8. About 600 maunds of fibre is annually produced down the river and in the Utarmachipura and Sri Pratap Singhpura tahsils and ilaqa Magan of the Pattan Tahsil and Khinhama. 

9. Zamindars pay to the lessee fixed amount as duty which varies according to the extent of the growth for the fibre and twigs of the hemp plant growing down the city and in the tahsils mentioned in paragraph 8. 

10. The leaves of the hemp plant are trodden under foot, and cleaned by sieve to prepare gard bhang, and this process is continued until the leaves are reduced to powder and seeds separated. This is always done by lessee in Srinagar, where the leaves are brought to undergo this process of manufacture. 

11. Manufacture and sale of gard bhang (chura charas) and fibre are auctioned, and the highest bid in the current year, Sambat 1950, amounted to Rs. 3,240. 

12. The monopoly of sale is practically given to the lessee, who appoints his own men for retail sale and makes his own arrangements for control of the growth of the wild hemp plant, the production of the ganja, and for its fibre. 

13. The number and sites of retail shops are not fixed, and it is optional for the lessee to open retail shops at suitable places not objected to by the people according to the requirements of the consumers. 

14. The maximum quantity for retail sale to, or possession by, the ordinary consumers of gard bhang is 5 tolas. 

15. No minimum price is fixed for " gard bhang," but it is usually sold at 3 pice per tola. 

16. Illicit sale to, and possession of gard bhang by, consumers in excess of the maximum amount are now generally dealt with on the criminal side under the State Penal Code for disobedience of rules duly promulgated. The rules are, however, defective and make no provision for prosecuting a man manufacturing ganja without a license or destroying the wild hemp plant, or for other similar cases, or binding the lessee to keep up register of produce of the drugs and sale. Framing of the new rules as more effective preventive measures for such purposes is under consideration. 

17. The illicit sale of the Yarkand charas apparently prevails, but to a very small extent, as the Yarkand charas is not liked by the Kashmiris, which is the only drug passing through Kashmir for British India. 

18. The drug being usually leased, lessee makes his own arrangements for prevention of the illicit sale, as he does for the control of the growth of the plant. The contractor of duty on custom and octroi also in his own interest has supervision on the Yarkand charas to see that it passes the country sealed intact, as, if sold in the city, he is entitled to duty on the same. 

19. The annual consumption of the ganja or locally known gard bhang (chura charas) is about 63 maunds, or, in other words, the entire quautity thus manufactured is locally consumed. 

20. The gard bhang as produced in this province is of inferior quality, and being not liked by the people in British India its smuggling is of rare occurrence, or in fact I cannot quote a single case of this nature. 

21. In the present year lessee, on account of damage done to the hemp plant by the recent flood, could not produce more than 35 maunds, and he had therefore purchased the Yarkand charas passing through Kashmir to meet the local requirements by mixing the Yarkand charas with the local produce, foreign produce being not liked by the consumers, generally. 

22. Green or dry leaves of bhang are not sold for drinking and smoking. Bhang is very seldom used in this province for drinking and it is not at all used for smoking, and the people drinking it, whose number can hardly be more than 200, clean the dry leaves in their houses and roast them a little. A few dry leaves are put in a koondi with some black-pepper to prepare a fluid, and sometimes sugar also is mixed to make the liquid sweet to the taste. There is no prohibition for possession of the bhang leaves in any quantity. 

23. Bhang is also used in the preparation of majum, which is eaten to some extent by the Hindustanis and well-to-do Kashmiris.

24. The quantity of majum does not exceed one maund a year. 

25. Majum is manufactured by slightly boiling leaves, which are taken out of water and put into hot ghi; ghi possessing narcotic properties when mixed with ata and sugar makes majum for eating, but there are no habitual eaters of majum. 

26. Cultivation of hemp in this province is only impossible on the hills; and, excepting the stony lands, it can be cultivated throughout the province; but on account of the wild hemp, the growth of which is abundant throughout Kashmir proper, cultivation of the plant does not prevail at all, though not prohibited by the State. 

27. Higher up the river in the three tahsils of the Anantnag district and in the Nagam tahsil of the Srinagar district the hemp plant is cut by the zemindars of the neighbouring villages in the month of Kartik, lessee on behalf of the State, when hemp and manufacture of ganja are auctioned, receiving leaves of the plant in full and half of the fibre, the rest half of the fibre and the twigs going to the zemindars in lieu of their wages. 

28. Ganja does keep good with ordinary care in skins of sheep at most for two years after which it quite loses its effect, and no measure can prevent its deterioration. If not carefully kept free from wet and atmosphere, it loses its effect earlier than this. 

29. Fakirs and a few Musalmans and Pandits of the Srinagar city and towns smoke gard bhang (chura charas). 

30. The villagers are not accustomed to these drugs. 

31. The total number of persons who do smoke ganja is in this province approximately 2,000, and including the people of British India, the servants of visitors in spring, and the fakirs visiting the country on pilgrimage, the number may fairly be taken as 2,500, and they can be classed as follows:— 

Habitual moderate consumers, each consuming as an average about 1/5 tola per diem, costing about one pice Kham.... 2,000 
Habitual excessive consumers, each consuming as an average about 1 tola per diem, costing 3 pice.... 50 
Occasional moderate consumers, each consuming as an average about one masha 400 Occasional excessive consumers, each consuming about 3/4 tola, costing 2 pice and a pie.... 50 

Bhang is believed to be an astringent and anti-rheumatic also. 

32. The consumers are generally of low classes, Muhammadan and Hindu fakirs and a few notoriously bad characters, though well-to-do persons, mostly illiterate, idleness leading them to the practice of consuming gard bhang, and they are generally grown-up men. 

33. The use of the hemp drug as a habit is doubtless injurious mentally and physically, but there are other stimulants which are in no way less injurious than these drugs. The use of bhang for drinking, which is in no way stimulant, is of course most injurious, making the consumers lazy, coward, and senseless when taken in excess. 

34. Bhang is considered as digestive, but I have seen cases in which consumers being intoxicated ate much, and the result was on the contrary just the reverse, causing indigestion and leading to frenzy. 

35. It is easier than opium to break off the habit of smoking ganja or gard bhang as locally known, and the habit of consuming the same is due to bad company and idleness, which may gradually develop into the excessive, though moderate in the beginning. Considering the population of the province, which, according to the recent census, is 949, 041 souls, the number of consumers of gard bhang is very email, and in case of entire prohibition, which may give rise to discontent among the habitual consumers, it cannot amount at all to a political danger in the Kashmir Province. 

36. The area under the wild bhang being not measured and the lessees being not required under the rules to keep up registers, I cannot furnish information by years as asked for in the statement. I, however, give revenue on account of hemp drugs for the last twenty years. I could not get any further information for compilation of the statement, and it is impossible to prepare statement without such information as far as figures by years are concerned. 




Thursday, 29 October 2026

Cannabis in 19th Century India: The Baroda State

Based on the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission's report of 1893-94, this article includes: 

  • My overview of cannabis usage in the Baroda Agency of 1893-94
  • The Indian Hemp Drugs Commission's findings regarding the Baroda Agency
  • Baroda State Memorandum


Overview


(Image source: Wikipedia)

The 19th century Baroda State, according to the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission report of 1893-94, included the following districts: Baroda, Kadi, Amreli and Navsari. Wikipedia states that 'After the Second Anglo-Maratha War (1803–1805), the East India Company wrested control of much of Gujarat from the Marathas. However, the Gaekwads of Baroda (Vadodara) acknowledged British suzerainty and control of the state's external affairs in return for retaining nominal internal autonomy.' During the time of the Hemp Commission's study, Baroda State appears to have been going through a period of political tumult with no clear rulers. The kingdom was officially under the rule of Sayajji Rao Gaekwad III, selected by the British Government as ruler but he was a minor, and the effective rulers were a Council of Regency, in other words, the British. 

With effective control of the Baroda State in their hands, the British colonists did not waste much time in stripping down the State's cannabis culture. It appears that pressure from the British administration on export of ganja from Baroda State to the neighboring British-controlled states - primarily the Bombay Presidency whose Gujarat District intermingled with the Baroda State in many places - was a major factor in the drastic reduction of the area under cannabis cultivation. Cheap ganja exported or smuggled from Baroda into British-controlled territories meant competition for the government-regulated ganja that the British were trying to promote in their territories and elsewhere. We saw in the case of Gwalior and Indore in the Central India Agency as well the political pressure applied by the British administration to curb exports from these native states to British-controlled territories. 

The Baroda State Memorandum as published by the Hemp Commission in its Volume 3 - which contains the memoranda submitted by the various states covered by the Commission in its study of 1894-95 - appears strangely incomplete. Large sections of the memorandum appear missing if one goes by the numbering of the various points in the memorandum. 

The manner and forms in which cannabis was consumed in Baroda was reported to be similar to that of the northern part of the Bombay Presidency, i.e., the Gujarat Division, where the primary form in which it was consumed was as the beverage, bhang. The Commission states that 'Baroda consumption is the same as that of the northern part of Bombay Presidency.' 

It appears that the conditions in the Baroda State were suitable for cannabis cultivation, indicating that there would have been an extensive cannabis culture in the State before restrictions and regulations started taking effect around the middle of the 19th century across India. This meant extensive homestead cultivation or home growing by the cannabis community in the state. The Baroda Memorandum states that 'The hemp plant can be grown in any part of His Highness's territory with advantage: the conditions of climate, soil, rainfall are favourably adapted to the growth of the plant. It is thus found in the compounds of sadhus, fakirs, and other people who consume ganja or bhang.' The Hemp Commission quotes the Baroda Memorandum stating that "it is said that this plant was sown largely in various places. But the restriction placed by the British Government on exportation obliged the cultivators to give up cultivation. It is now cultivated in one village, Bhadran, where bhang is made for home consumption.' At the time of the Hemp Commission's report, a mere 6 acres of land was stated to be under cannabis cultivation in the Baroda State.  

The new excise rules introduced in 1892 played a significant role in the demise of cannabis in the Baroda State. The new excise rules appear to have not only greatly reduced the area under cannabis cultivation, but also to have also completely killed exports from Baroda State, imports into Baroda State and retail sales within the State. Regarding the changes brought about in the administration of cannabis, the Hemp Commission reports that 'It may be noted that the change in the system of administration above referred to consists in the establishment of depôts in which all imports have to be stored, and from which they can only be removed under permit, and apparently a great increase in fixed duties.' Besides these changes reported by the Hemp Commission, we also see the Baroda Memorandum stating that one licensed vendor was instituted for every division in the Baroda State. Only this licensed vendor could export and import ganja or sell it through retail. The Baroda Memorandum also states that the number of shops in each division was reduced and fixed.

The setting up of a preventive mechanism solely dedicated to controlling cannabis through the use of the judiciary and law enforcement also instilled fear in the small-scale cultivator and trader. The Baroda Memorandum states that 'The chief control in regard to these drugs now rests with the divisional Subha assisted by the Abkari Superintendent, who has a number of Inspectors under him, to supervise the licensed shops, and to prevent commission of offences connected with the illicit importation or sale of the drug... The Sir Subha is the chief central authority who leases out the right of vending and examines annually the divisional administration carried on by the Subha.' 

The Baroda Memorandum states that prior to February 1892, there were no restrictions on export and import of ganja, except the payment of custom duty. Ganja was sold in common retail outlets owned by Tambolis and Gandhis throughout the Baroda State, except in large cities and areas of high consumption, where the right to vend was auctioned to the highest bidder. With the introduction of new rules, notified in December 1891, stating that only licensed vendors could export or import ganja, the entire situation changed. The Baroda Memorandum states that 'The export trade has now become extinct since the publication of the Notification No. 10, dated 10th December 1891, which put a stop to importation or exportation by any person other than licensed vendor for each division.'  The impact of these changes, as per the Baroda Memorandum, were 'Previous to the introduction of the monopoly system, everybody was at liberty to import bhang and ganja on payment of customs duty, except at large places, which were leased out to the highest bidder. Exportation of bhang and ganja was not restricted, nor was home consumption regulated. Every street had its own shop and anybody could sell it with impunity.'

Effectively, the changes brought about by the Notification in December, 1891, established the contractor or wholesaler as the single person with monopoly over the cannabis trade in a division. The Baroda Memorandum contains a sample agreement between a wholesaler (called "Government farmer" here) and the terms it involved. A right to vend was valid for 3 years, and the wholesaler had to pay the government a fixed sum for this right, paid in annual instalments. The wholesaler could only procure cannabis from licensed sources. He could set up retail outlets, a list of which had to be furnished with the agreement. The agreement contained rules on the timings of the retail outlet, the quantity that could be sold to an individual, the requirement of keeping detailed accounts, etc. Storage of stock had to be maintained at government-authorized depots from which every amount withdrawn required permits from the officials and careful recording. The changes to the system appear to have, by itself, greatly reduced the number of retail outlets from which one could purchase ganja. The wholesalers in Baroda and Kadi opened far less retail outlets than the number that was fixed for each district. At the time of the Hemp Commission's study, in Baroda, only 61 of the fixed number of 124 retail outlets were opened. In Kadi, the proportion was even less, with only 18 of the fixed number of 95 fixed retail outlets being opened. So, ganja which had been available till that point at common retail outlets owned by Tambolis and Gandhis were now only available in a very small number of retail outlets owned by the licensed wholesalers. This, by itself, would have served to greatly reduce the supply of ganja to consumers. The new system saw a drastic decrease in the amount of ganja imported into the Baroda State, as well as a great increase in the price of the available ganja at retail outlets. The Baroda Memorandum states that 'Since the introduction of the new system, the sale has very much fallen off on account of the rise in the price of bhang and ganja. Before introduction of the present measure, ganja was sold 4 tolas per pice, and now it is below one tola. Bhang was sold then 8 tolas per pice and it is now sold two tolas per pice.' The Baroda Memorandum further states that 'This taxation has in certain places increased the price four-fold and in others sixfold than what was sold before the introduction of the new measure, and the consumption has fallen off wonderfully.'

According to the Baroda Memorandum, the Kunbis were the main class of cultivators while the Tambolis and Gandhis were involved in the various preparations made from the cannabis plant, including bhang. This appears to have changed with regulation, with only those holding valid licenses being authorized to perform these activities. Local cultivation of cannabis died out by 1892 as a result of the new system that required a cultivator to sell his produce only to a licensed wholesaler. The Baroda Memorandum states that 'No restrictions are placed on cultivation, nor are they necessary, as cultivation has died out of itself for causes beyond the control of His Highnesses' Government... However, there is a safeguard provided that in case of any cultivation, the produce should be sold to none but the Government farmer.' The phrase 'causes beyond the control of His Highnesses' Government' seems to indicate that this was something that had been foisted upon the Baroda State by the British administration against the wishes of the Baroda rulers.

The limits imposed on possession as per Notification 10 - 1 seer of 40 tolas of ganja or 4 seers of 40 tolas each of bhang - for all persons in the state except those cultivators who sought to sell the produce to licensed wholesalers also meant that all the ganja was now in the hands of the wholesaler. Apparently, the author of the Baroda Memorandum did not seem satisfied with the rules imposed and wanted possession limits to be reduced even further from 40 tolas of ganja to 10 tolas. The Baroda Memorandum states 'With all these excellent arrangements of control, the object in view of checking the excessive use of these drugs is nullified by the clause in the said notification, rendering possession of one seer of ganja or preparations thereof, or four seers of bhang or preparations thereof, lawful. The object was a laudable one, inasmuch as it was studiously inserted to soften the severity of the measure, having had bitter experience of hardship entailed by the Opium Rules. But the object was frustrated by the cheap sales of the drug in the surrounding Native States, flooding His Highness's territory with their narcotic articles and allowing opportunities for excessive indulgence... The first modification that is necessary is to make the possession of ganja over ten tolas or preparation thereof, or half a seer of bhang or preparation thereof, unlawful.' He did not see, to think that even this would suffice, given that cheap ganja would still flow in from the surrounding native states, thus acknowledging that preventive measures of this sort are impossible to implement unless even the surrounding regions were made party to the restrictions. That regulations were imposed in Baroda State at the behest of the British is clear when one sees that much of the rules in Notification 10 were derived from the Opium Rules. The equating of cannabis to opium - a far more dangerous drug that the British were fond of - could only have been carried out by the British, who aimed to replace cannabis in India with opium. This replacement of India's spiritual and medicinal herb, cannabis, with opium could not have been achieved without the support of the Indian upper castes and upper classes who themselves had mimicked the British and replaced their cannabis with opium by 1891. 

Baroda State was merged with Gujarat in the modern reorganization of states. The modern state of Gujarat is, today, at the heart of India's legal opium industry, its synthetic pharmaceutical industry, and its petrochemical industry. The current prime minister Narendra Modi and India's leading petrochemical multibillionaires Gautham Adani and Mukesh Ambani hail from Gujarat. So, we could say that the political situation in the erstwhile Baroda State has not changed much at all since the Hemp Commission's study in 1893-94. The caretakers that the British left behind - to ensure that opium continues to thrive, adding petrochemicals and synthetic pharmaceuticals to the bouquet of offerings - continue to work tirelessly to multiply the wealth of their colonial masters and themselves while the rest of Baroda, India and the world wither under the effect of these actions... 


The Indian Hemp Drugs Commission's findings

THE EXISTENCE, PREVALENCE, AND CHARACTER OF THE SPONTANEOUS GROWTH

Baroda.
80. The official report on the use of hemp drugs in the Baroda State by Anant Gangadhar Khoti states that "wild ganja is not to be found in this part of the country. It is neither cultivated nor does it grow spontaneously in any part of His Highness's Dominions;" and again "in none of the districts of this State does the hemp plant grow spontaneously." There may possibly be some confusion in the mind of the reporter as to the wild ganja plant being specifically distinct from that which is usually cultivated, for there is some small extent of cultivation in the State. But it may be safely inferred that the hemp plant has nowhere run wild, even if a chance plant may occasionally be found.


EXTENT OF CULTIVATION, AND ITS TENDENCY TO INCREASE OR DECREASE.

147. The Baroda report states that "it is said that this plant was sown largely in various places. But the restriction placed by the British Government on exportation obliged the cultivators to give up cultivation. It is now cultivated in one village, Bhadran, where bhang is made for home consumption. No narcotic hemp is cultivated either for the production of charas or its flowers or seeds." The area is about 10 to 12 bighas. It is also found in the compounds of sadhus, fakirs, and other people who consume ganja or bhang. There is no reason to suppose that this latter kind of cultivation is very common.


METHODS OF CULTIVATION AND MATTERS CONNECTED THEREWITH.

Baroda.
216. No details are furnished in the State report, but the cultivation is of very small extent, and it may be confidently assumed that its methods are the same as those of the Gujarat Division of Bombay, with which the greater part of the Baroda territory is intermingled.


PREPARATION OF THE RAW DRUGS FROM THE CULTIVATED AND WILD PLANT

Baroda.
270. Bhang alone is prepared in the Baroda State. It is of the same kind and prepared by the same processes as are found in the Gujarat Division of the Bombay Presidency.


TRADE AND MOVEMENT OF THE HEMP DRUGS

Baroda.
332. The average area of cultivation in the Baroda State is about 11 bighas or 6 acres, of which the outturn is 76 maunds of bhang. It appears that early in 1892 the system of administration was reformed. Exports have consequently ceased, and the nature of the statistics is now materially different from what it was before the change. In the first year of the new order of things the trade was probably disorganised, and it will therefore be better to refer to the figures of 1892-93 alone. These show an import of 214 maunds of ganja and 31 maunds of bhang. The retail sales of ganja in the same year were 438 maunds and of bhang 143 maunds. The ganja would appear to have come from the Deccan, and the bhang may have been partly supplied by Gujarat; but there is no clear information on the point. There is an export of 91 maunds of ganja entered against the Baroda Division, but there is nothing to show that it went out of the State. Charas is not used in the State. It may be noted that the change in the system of administration above referred to consists in the establishment of depôts in which all imports have to be stored, and from which they can only be removed under permit, and apparently a great increase in fixed duties.


EXTENT OF USE AND THE MANNER AND FORMS IN WHICH THE HEMP DRUGS ARE CONSUMED

Hyderabad, Mysore, Rajputana, Central India, and Baroda
407. It is hardly worth while to examine in detail the statistics and evidence relating to the extent to which the hemp drugs are used in the great Native States and Agencies. These territories are surrounded and intermingled with British territories, regarding which the question has been fully discussed, with the result that the statistics were found in most cases to be far from an accurate index of consumption, and the evidence did not justify very precise conclusions. More definite results, or equally definite, will certainly be obtained from the information supplied by Native States. The extent of use in each part of these territories may be taken to resemble that in the neighbouring British provinces.  The use of ganja will be found to prevail over the States of the Central India Agency as it does in the North Western Provinces, Bengal, and the Central Provinces. The use of bhang will be more common than that of the other drugs in Marwar and the north-western parts of Rajputana, and it will extend southwards towards the Bombay Presidency, and eastwards towards the States of Central India, gradually meeting with more competition from ganja. A moderate use of charas will be found all over the States which are within easy reach of the Punjab and the North-Western Provinces.  The extent of use of ganja in Hyderabad will be fairly well indicated by the estimates of Berar, the Bombay Presidency, and Madras as regards the parts of the State contiguous to those provinces, and a similar process of examination will give the consumption of Mysore. In these two States bhang as a separate form of the raw drug has practically disappeared, but charas finds a few consumers in Hyderabad. Baroda consumption is the same as that of the northern part of Bombay Presidency. 



BARODA STATE MEMORANDUM

Wild ganja. 
22. Wild ganja is not to be found in this part of the country. It is neither cultivated nor does it grow spontaneously in any part of His Highness' dominions. 


Charas. 
23. Charas is neither imported nor used by the people of this part of the country. Bawas and Atits who travel in Northern India sometimes bring charas with them, which is solely used by them. 


Ganja and bhang. 
24. When I speak of ganja and bhang, I always mean flat ganja imported from Southern Maratha Country and bhang purchased in His Highness's territory or imported from Palanpur. 


Chura. 
25. Chura is commonly known as garda in this part of the country. It is not imported in its original form, but assumes it in manipulation and in the process of packing. It is used in several preparations, of which I shall speak hereafter.


The names by which the drug is locally known. 
26. The hemp drug is generally known in this part of the country as ganja and bhang. The consumers of ganja and bhang have given them different names and they are known by those names in different social circles. 


Cultivation and growth of hemp. 
32. In none of the districts of this State does the hemp plant grow spoutaneously. There is no cultivation, so to say, of the hemp plant in the State except in one place, viz., Bhadran of the Petlad taluka. It is generally from ten to twelve bighas annually. 

33. The land adapted for bhang and ganja cultivation is what is called here goradu, a friable sandy loam. The first operations for cultivation are started in the month of March. The land is first ploughed generally three or four times and then freely manured with dung of cattle. When the rains set in and the land is perfectly saturated it is again ploughed and harrowed. The seeds are then sown from 4 to 5 seers per bigha. When the seedlings grow to the height of six inches they are rooted out and transplanted on the ridges made for the purpose There they are allowed to remain for three or four months. During the interval the weeding process is continued and when the plants commence budding the male plants are removed, that the female tree may not bear fruits or seeds. 

34. When the flowers are well developed the plants are cut and spread on the ground where they are allowed to remain to be softened by the nocturnal dews. 

35. Early in the morning the treading process is carried on till noon, continuing to do so till the flowers with young tops assume a flat shape. 

36. This is the process adopted by the cultivators for manufacturing flat ganja, the older leaves and fruit vessels being bhang. The yield per bigha of ganja is 8 to 10 maunds and bhang 8 to 12 maunds. 

37. The hemp plant can be grown in any part of His Highness's territory with advantage: the conditions of climate, soil, rainfall are favourably adapted to the growth of the plant. It is thus found in the compounds of sadhus, fakirs, and other people who consume ganja or bhang. 

38. It is said that this plant was sown largely in various places. But the restriction placed by the British Government on exportation obliged the cultivator to give up cultivation. It is now cultivated in one village, Bhadran, where bhang is made for home consumption. No narcotic hemp is cultivated either for the production of charas or its flowers and seeds. The cultivators are an ordinary class of Kunbis. 

40. Two pounds of the home-bred bhang is herewith sent as a specimen for favour of being forwarded to the Secretary, Indian Hemp Drugs Commission. 


Preparation and manufacture. 
41. Bhang is the only product prepared in this State. Various other preparations are made from ganja, garda, and bhang. They were formerly made by the Tambolis and the Gandhis, but at present prepared by the license holder.

55. Before February 1892 there were no restrictions placed either on the importation or exportation of bhang and ganja, the importer had but to pay the customs duty. 


56. The number of shops was not fixed nor was the sale or export regulated. Everybody on payment of import duty was free to deal in the drug as he pleased. Hence the quantity disposed of in home consumption and quantity exported cannot be ascertained.


57. Ganja and bhang were then sold in every shop of the Gandhi and Tamboli, except in places where the bhang and ganja were much used. In such places the right of selling these drugs was leased out to the highest bidder and large consumption was thus brought partly under control and excessive use restricted. 


58. A large quantity of bhang and ganja was then exported from His Highness' territory by traders to the surrounding Native States and much profit was made by them. 


59. The export trade has now become extinct since the publication of the Notification No. 10, dated 10th December 1891, which put a stop to importation or exportation by any person other than licensed vendor for each division. 


60. Bhang and ganja which appeared in every shop of the Gandhi and Tamboli are now only sold in the shops licensed for the purpose. 


61. The number of shops in each division is fixed and the sale of bhang and ganja is regulated.


62. The following translation of the agreement will give a better idea of the restrictions placed upon the sale and manufacture of bhang and ganja by the Government farmer:— 

"I pass this agreement in writing that my tender for the exclusive right of selling bhang, ganja, and the preparations thereof at the appointed shops, a list of which is herewith annexed in all the talukas of the Prant, for a period of three years from 1st August 1893 to 31st July 1896, is accepted on condition of my paying into the Government treasury an annual sum of Rs. .... British currency, I bind myself to act according to the terms of the agreement mentioned below. 

2. The following are the instalments by which the amount of the izara, namely, the sum of Rs. .... British is to be paid to Government:— 

I shall pay to Government the sum of Rs. ... British annually, being the amount of the instalments aforesaid within the 15th of next month of the instalments falling due. If I shall fail to pay within the said dates, I shall pay interest at the rate of 6 1/4 per cent. per annum on the amount of the instalment from the day next after the one on which it falls due. If the interest and the amount due be not paid in due time, Government are at liberty to recover them according to the rules for the recovery of arrears of land revenue and annul the contract. 

3. I shall not be entitled to compensation if any loss is incurred by the failure of season or any other causes. The responsibility of the loss rests on my head, nor shall I claim any remission from the amount of the izara on account of such loss. 

4. I shall open shops at such places as are mentioned in the list or at places which shall be fixed by the Subha of the district. I shall keep such shops open from sunrise till 9 o'clock P.M. I shall open and maintain new shops and close existing shops as may be required. I shall not complain of any loss that may accrue by such proceedings. 

5. As I have farmed the right of selling bhang, ganja, and the preparations thereof, I shall make my own arrangements for procuring them. I shall not purchase these articles from persons who do not possess a license from this Government for selling them other than the cultivators of bhang and ganja in this State. In case I have occasion to import or export these articles into or from foreign territory, I shall import or export them in accordance with the rules laid down in Notification No. 10, dated 10th December 1891. I shall keep in store such quantity of the articles as shall be directed by the Subha of the district. 

6. If it shall be found necessary to store bhang, ganja, and the preparations thereof in one place, I shall store them in such a place of of depôt as shall be fixed by the Subha of the district. Articles issued from such a place of depôt for retail sale shall be removed and transported under a permit from the Subha or such other officer as authorized by the Subha to grant such permits. I shall keep accounts of them for each sale in accordance with the annexed form A shown to me. 

7. The Government are at liberty to destroy such bhang, ganja, and other articles as are in the opinion of the Subha of the district injurious to the health of the consumers. 

8. I shall not be entitled to claim the remaining stock of bhang, ganja, and the preparations thereof which shall remain at the expiration of the term of the farm or when it is annulled. Such balance shall be considered to be the property of Government, and the Subha of the district shall take it in his possession, and such portion of the bhang, ganja, and the preparations thereof thus taken in possession by the Subha, as is injurious to the health of the consumers shall be disposed of in accordance with the preceding clause 7, while the rest of the articles shall be made over to the new farmer at a price fixed by the Subha and the price thus adjusted shall be accepted by me. 

9. I shall not sell bhang, ganja, and the preparations thereof at other shops or places than those already appointed. 

10. I shall not sublet any shop or shops reserved for the sale of bhang, ganja, and the preparations thereof without permission of the Subha of the district. I shall not employ for the retail sale of bhang, ganja, and the preparations thereof any person, for whose employment I may not have previously received written sanction. I shall receive this sanction from the Subha of the district or from some other officer authorized by the Subha to grant such sanction before employing any person for retail sale. 

11. I shall not, without permission of the Subha of the district, sell more than a seer of 40 tolas of ganja or the preparations thereof, or more than 2 seers of 40 tolas each of bhang or the preparations thereof, to any person in one day. 

12. I shall not receive any articles other than cash, or keep anything in pledge in barter for bhang, ganja, or the preparations thereof. I shall sell bhang, ganja, and the preparations thereof for the money that is current in each place.

13. I shall not open any shops for the sale of bhang, ganja, or the preparations thereof, or make sale therein after 9 P.M. and before sunrise; nor shall I harbour any person of bad repute in the shops. 

14. I shall not permit persons of notoriously bad character to resort to my shops, nor shall I permit gambling or disorderly conduct, or indecent behaviour therein. I shall forthwith give information to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer of any suspected persons resorting to my shops. 

15. I shall have always fixed up in a prominent place at the entrance of my shops a signboard bearing the following inscription in legible characters in the vernacular language:— 

'Licensed shop for the sale of bhang, ganja, and the preparations thereof.' 

16. I shall keep daily accounts printed in form B bearing the seal and signature of the Subha of the district or the Vahivatdar of the taluka, and shall daily enter the amount of articles sold in it. Besides this I shall furnish on demand by the Subha of the district such other accounts, returns, and information respecting the dealings as the Subha may require. 

17. I shall, on being asked by any officer authorized to do so, produce for inspection the license I have received as well as the bhang, ganja, and the preparations thereof in the shops or in the depôt, and the accounts kept in accordance with the rules in force. 

18. I shall keep in possession the proper weights for selling bhang, ganja, and the preparations thereof, and get them stamped at my own expense and shall produce them for inspection on demand by any officer authorized to do so. 

19. I shall receive the balance of bhang, ganja, and the preparations thereof in the possession of the previous farmer for the prices fixed by the Vahivatdars of the talukas and shall pay the prices to the Vahivatdars. 

20. I shall pay the customs duty or any tax on bhang, ganja, and the preparations thereof that may have been or may hereafter be levied. 

21. If I or my servants or agents shall violate the conditions of the agreement, I shall be liable to a fine which may extend to Rs. 200; if the fine be not paid, Government is at liberty to recover it as an arrear of land revenue. And if I or my servants or agents act in contravention of, or omit to act in accordance with, the conditions of the license, or the terms of the notification issued in this connection, I shall, in addition to our liability to criminal prosecution, be held responsible for any acts or omission unless and until I prove that due precautionary measures to prevent such commission or omission were adopted. 

22. If I or my servants or agents shall violate any conditions of the license or the terms of the notification issued in this connection or be convicted of an offence under any law, the license shall be liable to be withdrawn. 

23. If my farm is cancelled or if I fail to fulfil the conditions before its term expires, Government shall make such arrangements as it thinks best; I shall make good any loss which Government may incur by such proceedings without being entitled to any compensation. 

24. When the farm is thus annulled, all the bhang, ganja, and the preparations thereof remaining unsold shall be made over to the Subha, and shall be duly disposed of by him, and the vessels, packages, and conveyances which may have been seized shall be returned to me within two months after I shall have made good the whole loss. 

25. If I fail to carry out the farm before its term expires according to the conditions of the agreement, I shall pay from my own property any sum that may be found to be due from me; and if this sum cannot be recovered from me, Government are at liberty to recover it from the amount deposited by me. 

26. I shall deposit in the Government treasury a sum of 15 per cent. on the amount of the izara. 

27. In case of any dispute which cannot be settled by a reference to these terms, I agree to any settlement that may be arrived at by a reference to the rules of auction sales in force." 


63. The following statement will show the number of shops fixed and the number of shops opened by the farmers:




69. The use of bhang and ganja is on the decrease in the State as will be clear from the quantity imported for sale during the last five years in each division, the reason for the decrease being increase in the price of these drugs. 


70. The following is the quantity imported in all the divisions for the last five years:=



71. Since the introduction of the new system, the sale has very much fallen off on account of the rise in the price of bhang and ganja. Before introduction of the present measure, ganja was sold 4 tolas per pice, and now it is below one tola. Bhang was sold then 8 tolas per pice and it is now sold two tolas per pice. 


72. Several persons have deposed in the course of the inquiry that the bhang and ganja have become dearer than what they were before, and that they are therefore consuming less than before, a fact not to be lost sight of that heavy duty on intoxicants lessens the consumption—a safer course to be adopted than total prohibition. 


Administration, taxation, and control
165. There is no cultivation of hemp drugs in the Baroda State except in one place to a very small extent. 

166. No restrictions are placed on cultivation, nor are they necessary, as cultivation has died out of itself for causes beyond the control of His Highnesse's Government. 

167. However, there is a safeguard provided that in case of any cultivation, the produce should be sold to none but the Government farmer. 

168. The administration in regard to the import, export, and sale of bhang and ganja is based on the Notification No. 10, dated 10th December 1891. A translation in English is given below for easy reference, and for fully understanding the rules in force— 

NOTIFICATION NO. 10. 

"By order of His Highness the Maharaja Saheb it is hereby notified that, whereas there is no restriction at present in the State as regards the places in which and the prices at which bhang, ganja, and the preparations thereof should be sold, and there is consequently a likelihood of these articles being misused, and whereas Government is anxious to prevent such misuse, it is hereby enacted as follows:— 

"2. That except those persons who cultivate bhang or ganja in this State, no person shall without permission of the Subha, have in his possession, or in any place, more than a seer of 40 tolas of ganja or the preparations thereof, or more than 4 seers of 40 tolas of bhang or the preparations thereof."

3. That except those who cultivate bhang or ganja in this State, and those persons or their agents who may have been licensed by the Subha to sell bhang, ganja, or the preparations thereof, no person shall sell the aforesaid articles. 

"4. Cultivators of bhang and ganja in this State are permitted by the last preceding clause to sell bhang, ganja, or the preparations thereof. But these articles shall be sold only to those persons who shall have been licensed by the Subha to sell them, and to no other persons. 

"5. Any person desirous of having in his possession, or of transporting from one place to another in this State, a larger amount of bhang, ganja, or the preparations thereof than what is permitted by the preceding clause shall obtain a license from the Subha for so doing. 

"6. Any person cultivating bhang or ganja, who sells bhang, ganja, or the preparations thereof to persons other than the licensees, or any person who possesses without a license from the Subha more than a seer of ganja or the preparations thereof, or more than 4 seers of bhang or the preparations thereof, or who sells without a license from the Subha, bhang or ganja, or the preparations thereof, or transports them from one place to another in this State without a license from the Subha, shall on conviction before a Magistrate be liable to be punished with fine which may extend to Rs. 200 or with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months; and the articles seized (that is bhang, ganja, or the preparations thereof) shall also be liable to confiscation. 

"7. Inamdars, jaghirdars, and other hakdars, who may be in the enjoyment of the rights of possessing, selling, or causing to be sold, bhang, ganja, or the preparations thereof, and who may suffer loss by the withholding of those rights, shall lay their claims for compensation before the Subha within one year from the date of this notification. 

"8. Any officer of the departments of Police, Revenue, Customs, Abkari, Opium, and Forest may detain and search, in any open place or on the public roads any person whom he has reason to believe to be guilty of an offence under the preceding clause 6. When the search is to be made by entering a building, it may be done by a police officer not inferior in rank to a Naib Fouzdar, or by an officer of Revenue, Customs, Abkari, Opium, and Forest departments, superior in rank to a Karkoon, or by any other person authorized by the Subha in this behalf. 

"9. Any offence committed under the preceding clause 6 by any person shall be inquired into by any police officer not inferior in rank to a Naib Fouzdar, or any officer of the Departments of Revenue, Customs, Abkari, Opium, and Forest, superior in rank to a Karkoon. 

"10. Any Magistrate convicting an offender under the terms of this notification may grant to any person who has contributed to the arrest and conviction of the offender a reward not exceeding one-fourth of the realized amount of the fine imposed, or the value of the articles confiscated in the case. 

"11. Nothing contained in this notification shall be deemed to affect the right of medical practitioners, chemists, or druggists or vendors of medical preparations, to prepare, sell, or supply bhang, ganja, or the preparations thereof for bonafide medical purposes. 

"12. This notification shall come into force on the 1st of February 1892." 


169. Importation and sale of this drug is, I can say, a State monopoly since February 1892. 


170. Previous to the introduction of the monopoly system, everybody was at liberty to import bhang and ganja on payment of customs duty, except at large places, which were leased out to the highest bidder. Exportation of bhang and ganja was not restricted, nor was home consumption regulated. Every street had its own shop and anybody could sell it with impunity. 


171. With a view to introduce better reforms and to bring the sale of the drug under the Government control in order to restrict importation and sale, the State monopoly was introduced. 


172. The chief control in regard to these drugs now rests with the divisional Subha assisted by the Abkari Superintendent, who has a number of Inspectors under him, to supervise the licensed shops, and to prevent commission of offences connected with the illicit importation or sale of the drug. 


173. The Sir Subha is the chief central authority who leases out the right of vending and examines annually the divisional administration carried on by the Subha. 


174. The farm for sale of the drug is either given for a year or three years. The following are the figures for the four divisions:— 



175. Government farmer alone now imports the drug on payment of customs duty besides the amount shown above.

 

176. He sells the drug at the fixed number of shops by his agency, approved of by the Subha, and makes preparation from the drug at licensed places. 


177. The imported drug is stored at depôts appointed by the Subha, and the drug in transit by the farmer through His Highness's territory has to be covered by a permit signed by officer authorized in that behalf. 


178. Neither shops nor depôts can be increased without the permission of the Subha. Such permission is not granted until indispensable necessity is made out for opening a new shop or depôt. 


179. The number of retail shops is fixed by the Huzur. The guiding principle in fixing the number is the requirements of these drugs at places rather than area or population. Though there is no local option ascertained before opening shops, yet they are not forced upon the people. 


180. The terms of the above notification will clearly show that there is a constant supervision over the importation and sale, whether licit or illicit, by all the departments of the State, and there is a cordon of Nakas on the frontier which minimize the evils of illicit ingress or egress of these drugs. 


181. With all these excellent arrangements of control, the object in view of checking the excessive use of these drugs is nullified by the clause in the said notification, rendering possession of one seer of ganja or preparations thereof, or four seers of bhang or preparations thereof, lawful. The object was a laudable one, inasmuch as it was studiously inserted to soften the severity of the measure, having had bitter experience of hardship entailed by the Opium Rules. But the object was frustrated by the cheap sales of the drug in the surrounding Native States, flooding His Highness's territory with their narcotic articles and allowing opportunities for excessive indulgence. 


182. The first modification that is necessary is to make the possession of ganja over ten tolas or preparation thereof, or half a seer of bhang or preparation thereof, unlawful. This modification will not much go to prevent illicit importation of the drug as long as surrounding Native States will continue to sell cheap ganja and bhang. 


183. With all these hindrances in the way placed by the cheap sale of the drug in the surrounding Native States, the new measure has been productive of anxiously looked for results. The consumption of the drug has begun to fall off (side statement B*), giving figures of importation with the amount of revenue realized therefrom. The rise in the price has induced people to reduce their allowance, and though the number of consumers is, as it is said, not reduced, yet the quantity consumed is very much decreased. 


184. The present measure is too young to give any decided opinion or suggest any modifications. The object of all such modifications are more or less defeated by the want of cooperation of the surrounding Native States. 


185. The system of taxation on these drugs can be summed up in a few words, viz., customs duty plus the amount realized from the sale of sole right to vend. 


186. This taxation has in certain places increased the price four-fold and in others sixfold than what was sold before the introduction of the new measure, and the consumption has fallen off wonderfully. All this may not be due to the new measure, and although excessive indulgence in the drug be still a constant factor, yet the past result gives a promise of a future happy angury. 


187. It is said that a sudden rise in the price of liquor has driven people to consume ganja in certain places. How much truth there is in this allegation, cannot be determined, but granting it to be true, the Government has no reason to deplore as the havocs committed by alcohol are more fearful than those of narcotics. I, therefore, suggest no modification in the mode of taxation or its incidence on any of the intoxicants. 


188. There is only one shop in Baroda where bhang in liquid form is drunk on the premises. There are no such shops anywhere else. I see no objection to the opening of such shops as exposure to public view, and the heavy price of the drug particularly charged at such places check excessive consumption much better than when done in solitude. 


189. In conclusion, I beg most respectfully to state that I have done what I could do during the short time that was allotted to me. The magnitude of the task of collecting information from those who are particularly sensitive when questioned about their mode of life and their habits, and the hot haste with which the work was to be gone through, will, I am sure, induce you to look with a great indulgence on any defects that may have crept in. The humble effort made by me in this connection, if only meet with your approval, will be the ample reward for the pains that I have taken during the last month and a half.