Top Three Popular Posts

Friday, 3 May 2019

Cannabis and Afghanistan




The movement of animals, birds and insects result in the propagation of different species of plants to diverse geographies, as these beings serve as carriers of the seeds and pollen which they release in newer environments. The cannabis plant was carried by Asiatics across the land bridge connecting Asia with the Americas about 12,000 years ago and then cultivated there by the Native Americans. We see a similar movement of the opium plant through human carriers from the place where it was discovered initially, Greece, as per my knowledge, by the Romans to Germany and subsequently to the German descendants in Britain. Alexander the Great and his armies may have carried opium to Central Asia and the Near East in the 1st century BC. These areas were, however, traditionally cannabis regions with most communities using cannabis for their medical, intoxicant, industrial and religious needs. The impact of opium carried to these regions by the Greeks under Alexander may have been negligible. The British, and other European colonizers, appear to have carried their opium, and the love for it, as far as China. The British converted the traditional cannabis using people of China of the 17th century to opium. They successfully got the Chinese addicted to opium and convinced them to cultivate opium for them which they then carried back to their homeland. In the process, they managed to completely dislodge cannabis from Chinese culture. The British carried this process of conversion of nations from cannabis to opium all along their land routes from Britain to China. Having succeeded in establishing China as an outsourcing destination for their opium, the British then converted Burma (now Myanmar), India and Afghanistan to opium-producing countries. The methods that the British used to convert nations from cannabis to opium is clearly evident in the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission's report of 1894-95. This report deals primarily with India, but it is obvious that the methods that they tested and fine-tuned in China and Burma were the same that they used to remove cannabis from India, Afghanistan, the Carribean countries and Greece. The methods used to convert people from the harmless, medicinal and intoxicating cannabis were as follows: regulating and curbing the cultivation of cannabis; imposition of licenses, taxes, increasing prices and use of law enforcement; spreading of anti-cannabis myths such as - cannabis was addictive, cannabis caused insanity, only the lowest classes consumed cannabis, cannabis was against the religious sanctions, cannabis users were criminals, and so on. In all these efforts, the British were aided by the upper classes and castes of these nations who were willing to sell their mothers for a slice of the British power pie.

As China increased in power, it became a difficult trade partner for the British need for opium. China started exerting its own integrity leading to the opium wars between China and Britain. This, as well as the annexation of China by Japan during World War II, may have led the British to start developing Afghanistan as their primary opium outsourcing partner. India was anyway by now well and truly in Britain's grasp. Even after conceding independence to India, the British and Indian rulers ensured that India would supply opium to Britain. The conversion of the world's biggest cannabis nation to world's biggest legal opium producing nation today is probably the greatest achievement of the British empire, a fact that is not acknowledged much. To this day, India continues to serve its masters faithfully in this role. 

Afghanistan, home to one of the most ancient cultures of the world, has been ravaged systematically by many different invaders over thousands of years. From the Greeks, Mongols, Turks, Arabs, to the modern invaders Russia, US and the UK, the country has been constantly overrun by various people trying to gain control of it. Recently, the extremist group Taliban has been doing all it can to control the country, as has China and India once the western nations left. The primary reason cited for Afghanistan being such a coveted geography is its strategic location, as it is a key part of the mountainous land routes connecting Asia with Europe, and its precious minerals. The primary reason why so many nations covet and try to control Afghanistan, I believe, however, is its opium.

My understanding is that Afghanistan was developed by Britain, possibly with aid from other European nations like Russia, into the world's biggest producer of opium around the beginning and middle of the 20th century. By now, the Chinese were so addicted to their own opium that they had just enough for their own needs, and not enough for the needs of Britain and Europe. The Chinese also recognized the lucrative profits that opium trade offered. Given this situation, Afghanistan was ideal for the west. It was closer to home, connected well by the land routes. It had a climate in which the opium plant thrived. The people of Afghanistan were fierce warriors but simple folk who did not possess the guile of the British, or their wealth and their superior technology. It is most likely that the ruling classes of Afghanistan sold their people out to the British, much like the ruling classes in India. Over time, Afghanistan developed into the world's biggest opium producing nation. This was classified as illegal opium production, unlike in India where it is classified as legal opium production. When the British found it difficult to manage Afghanistan's opium production, they handed it over to the Russians. The Russians controlled it for some time before they handed it over to the descendants of the British, the Americans. The Americans used their guile to enter Afghanistan and maintained control till such time as public pressure forced them to leave. In the meantime, the Americans - the world's biggest market for opium - had developed a much more cost-effective opium cultivation destination much closer to home in Colombia. But none of these countries - the UK, Russia, the US - wanted to give up the goose that laid the golden egg, Afghanistan, so easily. This was because Afghanistan still produced the best opium in the world and in large enough quantities to meet at least part of the opium addiction of the west. So, these countries decided to set up their trained dogs to oversee the opium cultivation for them. They created the Taliban and armed them to oversee and ensure that the opium gardens of the west were protected. When the US left Afghanistan, they left behind sufficient arms and weapons to ensure that the Taliban could control the people of the country and keep opium production steady. They also had the neighborhood watchdogs in Iran and Pakistan to ensure that the status quo was maintained. In return, Pakistan got its opium as well as its weapons. Iran, while posturing to be anti-US, continued to get its share of opium from Afghanistan and served as distributor for the Middle East and Europe. Raw opium flows from Afghanistan both westward and eastward. Westward, it flows through Iran into the markets of the Middle East and Europe. Eastward it flows through Pakistan to the processing center in India. 

Today, the illegal cultivation of opium globally is, of course, mainly concentrated in Myanmar, Afghanistan, Colombia and now Mexico. These countries dominate cultivation. UNODC says, in its World Drug Report 2020, that 'Opium is illicitly produced in some 50 countries worldwide, although the three countries where most opium is produced have accounted for about 97 per cent of global opium production over the past five years. Afghanistan, the country where most opium is produced, which has accounted for approximately 84 per cent of global opium production over the past five years, supplies markets in neighbouring countries, Europe, the Near and Middle East, South Asia and Africa and to a small degree North America (notably Canada) and Oceania. Countries in SouthEast Asia – mostly Myanmar (some 7 per cent of global opium production) and, to a lesser extent, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (about 1 per cent of global opium production) – supply markets in East and South-East Asia and Oceania. Countries in Latin America – mostly Mexico (6 per cent of global opium production) and, to a far lesser extent, Colombia and Guatemala (less than 1 per cent of the global total) – account for most of the heroin supply to the United States and supply the comparatively small heroin markets of South America.'  Until recently, Afghanistan was the leading producer of illegal opium. UNODC states that 'In line with the dominance of the opium production in Afghanistan, quantities of heroin and morphine seized related to Afghan opiate production accounted for some 84 per cent of the global total in 2018, a slight decrease from 88 per cent in 2017, the year of the bumper harvest in the country. Most of the heroin found in Europe, Central Asia/ Transcaucasia and Africa is derived from opium of Afghan origin, accounting for 100 per cent of all mentions in the responses to the annual report questionnaire by countries in Central Asia/Transcaucasia, 96 per cent in Europe and 87 per cent in Africa over the period 2014–2018.' Myanmar, in December 2023, upstaged Afghanistan as the largest illegal opium producer. In Myanmar, the army has taken control over opium cultivation, working in conjunction with Chinese entities to ensure that the product meets the right user. All these countries create smoke screens, in the form of terrorism and conflict, to establish control over opium supplies. In this way the control of opium, much like the control of petroleum, lies in the hands of the global rich and powerful. With these moves, the rich ensure that their global supply of opium never stops. The global opioid pharmaceutical industry - both legal and illegal - sources a large part of its raw material from Afghanistan. China and India appear to have taken a stranglehold on their own opium production, directing the produce to their legal pharmaceutical industry through tight regulation. Both these countries, however, appear to pale in comparison to Afghanistan's opium production capability. Hence it is no surprise that Afghanistan cannot shake off its invaders and controllers.

Opium cultivation, I believe, is managed by global opium cartels, much like oil production is managed by the oil cartels. I believe that the Taliban and the military ruling Myanmar are just puppets being instructed by the opium cartel based out of North America, Europe, Iran, India and China in terms of how much opium to produce. Through this management, these entities determine how much opium must be cultivated in which source country, so as to keep the supply and prices of opium within their desired ranges, ensuring that the rich get their opium, and also get rich getting their opium. UNODC says that 'Despite global opium production in 2018 being less than in 2017, there have been no indications to date of a shortage in the supply of heroin to the respective consumer markets. In 2018 and 2019, both opium and heroin prices declined in the main opium production areas in Afghanistan, with opium farmgate prices falling by an average of 37 per cent (on a year earlier) in 2018 and by 24 per cent in 2019, while high-quality heroin prices fell by an average of 11 per cent in 2018 and by 27 per cent in 2019 in Afghanistan. Due to the bumper opium harvest of 2017, opium prices showed significant declines at an earlier stage (starting in 2017) than did heroin prices (basically starting in 2018), suggesting that it may have taken some time for clandestine heroin manufacture to adjust to the overall greater availability of opium before expanding, as later reflected in lower heroin prices. At the same time, data also show that, following two years of decreased opium production as compared with 2017, the downward trend in drug prices came to a halt, in the case of opium, in June 2019, and a few months later, in August 2019, in the case of heroin as well.' It says that 'Despite a long-term upward trend, the global area under opium poppy cultivation declined by 17 per cent in 2018 and then by 30 per cent in 2019, falling to an estimated 240,800 ha. Declines in the area under cultivation were reported in both Afghanistan and Myanmar in 2018 and 2019. Despite the recent declines, the global area under opium poppy cultivation is nevertheless still substantially larger than a decade ago and at similar level of the global area under coca cultivation.' The falling prices of opium and heroin, due to the bumper harvests in Afghanistan fueled by increasing poppy cultivation by farmers, appears to have prompted the global opium cartel to reinstate the Taliban as the puppet rulers of Afghanistan so as to ensure tighter regulation of poppy cultivation. The Taliban promptly cracked down on poppy cultivation. In fact, it did such a good job that Myanmar has now taken over as the biggest illegal opium producing nation in the world in 2023. This is most likely a matter of optimum pricing and logistics, though to the people of Afghanistan and the world, it will appear as if the Taliban is like a loving father who is concerned about the well-being of his children, even as he keeps the girl child from going to school so that she can be a slave to the men in the house. 

I suspect that the global opium cartel seamlessly switches opium supplies between legal and illegal markets, depending on the demand for the various opium derivatives, available supply, and the potential for profit. So, if there is a shortage of heroin in the illegal market, it will be diverted from the legal sources to meet the demand. Similarly, if there is a shortage of morphine in the legal pharmaceutical market, it will be diverted from the illicit market to meet demand. This seamless interplay between legal and illegal sources and markets ensures that demand, supply and prices are kept at an optimum to ensure maximum profit.

One of the best ways to traffic opium between countries is to send a shipment across through unwitting carriers and then inform the authorities in the recipient country about it. The authorities seize the opium and utilize it for their own purposes. This is probably the most cost-effective way as one need not pay the carrier. Besides this, international drug control agencies and the public are impressed with the action taken and nobody then asks any further questions about it, including what happens with the seized opium. This is how Iran, Pakistan, Turkey and India get their hands on the illegal opium cultivated in Afghanistan. UNODC, in its World Drug Report 2020, states that 'Almost 70 per cent of the global quantities of heroin and morphine (the two main internationally trafficked opiates) seized in 2018 were intercepted in Asia, mostly in South-West Asia. The two subregions surrounding Afghanistan, South-West Asia and Central Asia, together accounted for more than 56 per cent of the global quantity of heroin and morphine seized. Despite the decline in 2018, the overall trend in seizures of heroin and morphine in that subregion continued to be an upward one over the period 2008–2018. South-West Asia continued to account for the majority of the global quantities of heroin and morphine seized globally in 2018 (close to 56 per cent), with the largest quantities seized being reported by the Islamic Republic of Iran, followed by Afghanistan and Pakistan.' UNODC further states that 'The largest quantities of both opium and morphine seized were reported by the Islamic Republic of Iran, followed by Afghanistan and Pakistan, while seizures reported by other countries remained comparatively modest. The largest total quantity of heroin seized by a country in 2018 was that seized by the Islamic Republic of Iran (for the first time since 2014), followed by Turkey, the United States, China, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Belgium.' It further says that 'The largest quantities of opiates continued to be seized in South-West Asia in 2018, accounting for 98 per cent of the global quantity of opium seized, 97 per cent of the global quantity of morphine seized and 38 per cent of the global quantity of heroin seized that year (i.e., equivalent to 70 per cent of all opiates seized globally as expressed in heroin equivalents). Overall, 690 tons of opium, 42 tons of morphine and 37 tons of heroin were seized in South-West Asia in 2018.'  The myriad crisscrossing of opium - in its raw, processed and finished states - happens between numerous countries. Seizure happens mostly in neighbouring countries to the source. UNODC reports that 'The quantities of opium and morphine seized continued to be concentrated in just a few countries in 2018, with three countries accounting for 98 per cent of the global quantity of opium seized and 97 per cent of the global quantity of morphine seized. By contrast, seizures of heroin continue to be more widespread, with 54 per cent of the global quantity of heroin seized in 2018 accounted for by the three countries with greatest seizures.' UNODC says that 'The opiate seized in the largest quantity in 2018 continued to be opium (704 tons), followed by heroin (97 tons) and morphine (43 tons). Expressed in heroin equivalents, however, heroin continued to be seized in larger quantities than opium or morphine. Globally, 47 countries reported opium seizures, 30 countries reported morphine seizures and 103 countries reported heroin seizures in 2018, suggesting that trafficking in heroin continues to be more widespread in geographical terms than trafficking in opium or morphine.'  The International Narcotics Control Bureau (INCB) reports that 'In 2018, the main countries reporting utilization of opium for the extraction of alkaloids were the Islamic Republic of Iran (511.8 tons, or 56.3 tons of morphine equivalent), India (138.5 tons, or 15.2 tons in morphine equivalent) and Japan (41.6 tons, or 4.6 tons in morphine equivalent). The opium reported as utilized by the Islamic Republic of Iran originated from seized material.' Finally, the best heroin reaches the richest customers in the world, usually in North America and Europe. The richest people in the world get the best product - pure heroin. As one climbs down the social and economic ladder, the product available becomes more and more close to the raw opium. So, the next rung of the rich and powerful get morphine, hydrocodone and oxycodone. A lower rung gets tramadol and codeine. Among the lowest rungs, opium as raw product - in paste or straw form - is consumed.

Iran and Pakistan play interesting roles in this game of global opium addiction that has Afghanistan at the center. These countries function, I believe, as two-way valves, besides playing the watchman supervising Afghan opium production. When it suits their needs, Iran and Pakistan allow opium to flow freely through them. Through Iran it flows into the Middle East and Europe, with Iran taking its share of opium and revenue. Through Pakistan, opium flows into the processing units in India from where it goes out to the world as legal pharmaceutical opioids, with Pakistan getting its share of opium and revenue, besides arms and defense support from the US. UNODC reports that 'The Islamic Republic of Iran reported that 75 per cent of the morphine and 75 per cent of the heroin seized on its territory in 2018 had been trafficked via Pakistan, while the remainder had been smuggled directly into the country from Afghanistan. Typically, heroin is then smuggled to Turkey (70 per cent of all the heroin seized in the Islamic Republic of Iran in both 2016 and 2017) and from there along the Balkan route to Western and Central Europe, either via the western branch of the route via Bulgaria to various western Balkan countries or, to a lesser extent, via the eastern branch of the route via Bulgaria and then to Romania and Hungary, before reaching the main consumer markets in Western and Central Europe'.

The processing of opium is complex, with different stages of processing being done in different parts of the world, often far removed from the source regions cultivating the plant. For example, raw opium is procured legally or illegally from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Colombia, Mexico and India and processed into morphine in France, heroin in the UK, tramadol in India, etc. The source countries also process opium into heroin or morphine.

There are dedicated routes through land, sea, and increasingly air (especially through the use of armed forces aircraft), which supply the processed opium to North America, Europe, Africa, the Far East and Oceania. UNODC says that 'The world’s single largest heroin trafficking route continues to be the so-called “Balkan route”, along which opiates from Afghanistan are shipped to Iran (Islamic Republic of), Turkey, the Balkan countries and to various destinations in Western and Central Europe. Not counting seizures made in Afghanistan itself, countries along the Balkan route accounted for 58 per cent of the global quantities of heroin and morphine seized in 2018. A further 8 per cent of those global seizures were reported by countries in Western and Central Europe, whose markets are supplied to a great degree by heroin and morphine that is trafficked along the Balkan route'. Besides the Balkan route, heroin flows from the Middle East into Europe by sea as well. UNODC says that 'In contrast to Western and Central Europe as a whole, which continues to be supplied mainly by heroin trafficked along the Balkan route by land, trafficking to Belgium in 2018 to a large extent (98 per cent) took the form of maritime shipments departing from the Islamic Republic of Iran or Turkey. Similarly, trafficking to Italy was characterized by maritime shipments in 2018 (61 per cent of the total quantity seized by customs authorities), with the bulk of seizures in 2018 having departed from the Islamic Republic of Iran in containers, followed by shipments by air (37 per cent), often departing from the Middle East (Qatar) or Africa (South Africa), while heroin shipments destined for France typically transited the Netherlands and Belgium in 2018'. It appears that it takes about a year for harvested opium to be converted into heroin, and to finally reach the markets. UNODC reports that 'While the strongest increase in the quantities of heroin and morphine seized in 2017 was reported in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe (the same year as the bumper opium harvest reported in Afghanistan), the strongest increase in 2018 was reported in Western and Central Europe (89 per cent). This suggests that it may take a year from when opium is harvested in Afghanistan until it is manufactured into the heroin that ends up on the streets of Western and Central Europe. There were increases in heroin and morphine seizures in Europe in the countries along the Balkan route in 2018, although most of the increase was due to an increase in the quantities of heroin and morphine seized in Belgium and, to a lesser extent, in France and Italy.'

As if all this was not bad enough, we see that due to the huge global demand for painkillers and stimulants - and the artificial shortages created by cannabis prohibition and opium control - the emergence of dangerous synthetics from the pharmacist's lab such as methamphetamine and fentanyl. These synthetic products do not have a dependency on nature and so can be churned out in vast quantities from almost anywhere, anytime. Not only are they difficult to detect and control, their action on the human body and the natural environment is devastating since they have not gone through the natural selection process of evolution that plants like opium, coca, and cannabis have gone through. Fentanyl and methamphetamine are finding their way to not just the opium and cocaine addicted elites, they are finding their way to all levels of society and killing people (and the rest of the natural world) across the world. 

Even as the West and China embraced their opium addictions - using Afghanistan, Myanmar and Colombia as their outsourcing destinations for the production of opium - the US and Europe started developing a taste for the stimulant, cocaine. Cocaine was made famous by such noted figures as Sigmund Freud in the 19th century but its use really started taking off with the addition of cocaine to the bouquet of offerings provided by the drug cartels of South America. The problem with cocaine is that it is only cultivated in South America. This presents a problem of severe supply shortage for the elites of the world who consider the use of cocaine as one of their distinguishing features that separates them from the low-class masses. To solve this problem, methamphetamine was invented. Meth, as methamphetamine is also called in short, can be prepared in a lab anywhere in the world with ingredients that are freely available the world over. Meth is as good a stimulant as cocaine, even though it is probably much more lethal. The knowledge of manufacture of methamphetamine that was perfected in the US was transferred to the drug cartels of South America. US soldiers - the modern-day pollinators - carried this knowledge of methamphetamine manufacture to Vietnam because they could not afford cocaine like their generals and politicians who sent them there after creating a war in a distant land. The US soldiers transferred their knowledge of methamphetamine manufacture to the people of the far east and also got enough people addicted to it to start a manufacturing process there. When US soldiers went to Iraq and Afghanistan, they seeded the people in these countries with the habit of using methamphetamine and also trained them in its manufacture. Today, we see Afghanistan has added methamphetamine to its bouquet of outsourcing services in addition to opium. Methamphetamine use is now, along with the use of opium, one of the addictions plaguing the people of Afghanistan.

Initially the countries that led to the rise of methamphetamine appear to have been the US, Iran and China, possibly due to a shortage of cocaine and heroin in their local markets needed to meet increasing demand. But gradually, these countries seem to have outsourced manufacture to neighboring countries, who seem to have gladly stepped in to take up manufacturing on industrial scales, as against the numerous small-scale operations that dominated manufacture earlier. This appears to be a concerted move by those involved, in order to bring in efficiencies of cost, scale and distribution in the methamphetamine market. The US outsourced its methamphetamine manufacture to primarily Mexico, China to primarily Thailand and Myanmar, and Iran to primarily Afghanistan. The US, however, with its gluttony for stimulants, appears to have continued with its own manufacturing, in addition to outsourcing to Mexico. UNODC reports that 'Similar to the situation in the United States, where the manufacture of methamphetamine declined while increasing in neighbouring Mexico, both China and Iran (Islamic Republic of) reported declining domestic production, reflected in the decreasing numbers of methamphetamine laboratories dismantled in recent years, going hand in hand with the expansion of methamphetamine manufacture in their neighbouring countries. Indeed, by 2018 the Islamic Republic of Iran reported that most of the methamphetamine found on its territory originated in Afghanistan and was trafficked either from there directly or via Pakistan. Similarly, China reported that methamphetamine seized in recent years has originated primarily in Myanmar. In contrast to many other countries, however, the marked declines in the domestic manufacture of methamphetamine in China appear to have more than outweighed any increase in clandestine manufacture and imports from neighbouring countries. This is revealed in the decline in methamphetamine found in the wastewater in cities across China, with wastewater-based estimates suggesting a fall in methamphetamine consumption amounts of 26 per cent over the period 2014 –2018.' UNODC reports that 'Much of the methamphetamine production in these subregions was originally intended for exports to the rapidly growing markets of East and South-East Asia, but domestic markets also appear to have started to emerge in the Near and Middle East/ South-West Asia in recent years. Of 15 reporting countries in these subregions, 12 countries reported the use of methamphetamine by 2018 (or the latest year for which data are available). In the absence of scientific data for the Near and Middle East/South-West Asia, qualitative information on trends in methamphetamine use reported by national authorities to UNODC give an indication of the threat experienced by the region. National authorities have reported a clear upward trend in methamphetamine use in those subregions. Methamphetamine appears to have emerged in the Near and Middle East/South-West Asia as the main ATS used in the Islamic Republic of Iran (2009– 2018) as well as in Iraq (2016 and 2017), Lebanon (2014–2017), Bahrein (2016), Afghanistan (2015 and 2016), Israel (2014 and 2015) and Kuwait (2003, 2009, 2013'.

The geographical spread of methamphetamine manufacture has been driven by the easy availability of raw materials as stated earlier. UNODC reports that 'Countries identified as significant source countries for methamphetamine shipments in Asia in the period 2014–2018 included Myanmar, followed by China, Thailand, India and Iran (Islamic Republic of). Clandestine methamphetamine manufacture in Asia seems to be still largely based on the use of pseudoephedrine or ephedrine as precursors, although reports from Afghanistan suggest that ephedrine is extracted from ephedra plant material and used as a precursor for methamphetamine. The authorities in Myanmar and Thailand have reported the seizure of increasing quantities of sodium cyanide and benzyl cyanide in recent years. These substances can be used for synthesizing P-2-P, which is then used to manufacture either amphetamine or methamphetamine.' It also states that 'While the quantities of methamphetamine seized have increased rapidly over the past decade, seizures of internationally controlled chemicals used in the manufacture of methamphetamine have fluctuated over the years and showed a clear increase only in 2018, when methamphetamine precursor seizures almost tripled compared with 2017. The marked increase was the result of record quantities of P-2-P linked to methamphetamine manufacture in North America being seized – an almost ninefold increase – and the global quantities of ephedrine seized increasing almost fivefold. By contrast, the reported number of dismantled laboratories continued to decline, from 10,600 methamphetamine laboratories dismantled in 2010 to close to 3,700 in 2017 and less than 2,100 in 2018. A possible explanation of the phenomenon of an expanding market going hand in hand with fewer and fewer laboratories being dismantled could be a shift towards operating fewer but larger laboratories in parallel with a general shift in production to countries with comparatively limited interdiction capacities.' It further states that 'In contrast to previous decades, when methamphetamine was primarily manufactured from ephedrine and pseudoephedrine, nowadays more than half of seized precursor chemicals linked to the manufacture of methamphetamine are P-2-P and/or its precursor chemicals. There is, however, a significant geographical divide. Most methamphetamine production in Asia, Oceania and Africa – and possibly some in Europe – continues to be based primarily on ephedrine and pseudoephedrine as the key precursor chemicals, while manufacture of methamphetamine in North America is now primarily based on P-2-P and its precursor chemicals. In some instances, precursor chemicals for the manufacture of P-2-P also seem to have been used in the manufacture of methamphetamine in Western Europe.' The report says ''Regarding precursor chemicals, it has to be taken into account that increasing quantities of methamphetamine are now being produced from pre-precursors that are not under international control; for example, substances such as benzaldehyde and nitroethane are used in the clandestine manufacture of P-2-P, in both North America and Europe. Similarly, benzyl chloride and sodium cyanide are used in the clandestine manufacture of phenylacetic acid, which is also used to manufacture P-2-P, the main precursor used in methamphetamine manufacture in North America.' As the traditional precursors have been gradually brought under international control, methamphetamine manufacturers have innovated to create new precursors in the lab which do not fall under international control. Regarding this, UNODC reports that 'Many of the chemicals most commonly used as precursors to synthesize drugs such as amphetamine, methamphetamine and “ecstasy” have been placed under international control. Traffickers and manufacturers have sought alternatives – not only less well-controlled substances but also chemicals specifically designed to circumvent controls, known as “designer precursors”.'

So, the outsourcing of methamphetamine manufacture from the initial source countries - US, Iran and China - to first the neighbouring countries -  Mexico, Afghanistan, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand - was enabled by the dismantling of small manufacturing facilities and the creation of large-scale manufacturing in the neighbouring countries. The involvement of the drug cartels and the easy availability of alternate precursors further enabled this expansion to an increasing number of countries. UNODC reports that 'In Afghanistan, seizures of methamphetamine have steadily risen since 2014, when manufacturing seems to have started. But the amount seized in the first six months of 2019 – 657 kg – signals a huge leap on the previous year. The large seizures effected in other countries of methamphetamine thought to originate in Afghanistan also suggest that production in that country is rising fast.' 

One of the fundamental problems is that the countries and elites most addicted to opium, the biggest consumers of opium, do not have climatic conditions suitable for growing their own opium. So, they need to take countries like Afghanistan, Colombia and Myanmar as hostage and install watchdogs in the form of militia and drug cartels to oversee the production and ensure that the produce is not diverted. In addition to this, these elite opium addicts want their opium processed into products like methadone, morphine, oxycodone, heroin, etc., that they can consume in the form of pills, powders and injections, like babies who can only feed on highly processed food. In the course of processing natural opium into these products, the potency of opium increases drastically, as does the price. The high potency processed opium is even more addictive and lethal than raw opium. The opium-growing countries, as well as the coca-growing countries, have long histories of using these plants in natural form. The indigenous communities of these countries knew how to use the natural form of opium and coca and to live with it, with minimum damage to society and the environment. Since the elites control and dictate opium policy in the world, the indigenous communities in opium (and coca) producing countries rarely get to see the opium (or coca). The people of Afghanistan live in severe poverty and oppression while the profits from opium cultivation go to the elites who consume and trade in it.

The people of Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran are completely bamboozled by the deception their governments use to work with the US, UK and Russia. The primary weapon of deception used to subjugate the people of Afghanistan is religion. This is the weapon that is used in most Islamic countries. The clerics whose word is law work closely with the upper-class elites who, in turn, work closely with the leaders of the opium-loving nations of the west. The clerics tell the people that cannabis is evil, smoking is evil, intoxication is evil. The clerics weaponize the people against free-thinking through hate speeches and recruit youth into the military organizations that rule the country with weapons supplied by the west. The people shun cannabis, and even opium, so that there is no diminishing of the supplies to the west. If the people try opium, they get addicted to it and thus become all the more invested in its cultivation and protection against the threat of cannabis, which can release the people from all the chains of addiction and psychological, medical and economic poverty. Occasionally, the ruling militia in Afghanistan will make some noises to show the people that it is against opium cultivation, or possibly to adjust production in line with global demand and prices as dictated by the opium cartel. 

As with the use of religion to enslave and oppress the people of Afghanistan, the projection of cannabis as a drug that is as harmful as opium, or even more, is another factor behind this crisis in Afghanistan and the rest of the world. Cannabis is vastly safer and more beneficial to humans and other living beings than opium. There needs to be an increase in the awareness among the public about the benefits of cannabis and the harms of opium. But when the entire power structure - the physicians, political leaders, religious leaders, media, and so on - play up the harms of cannabis, and play down the harms of opium, most people fear cannabis and play into the hands of the opium cartels of the world. The treatment of cannabis on par with opium, or as even worse, is one of the primary reasons why the world faces the opium crisis that it does today. Most people in the world today cannot even differentiate between opium and cannabis, clubbing the two together, while glorifying the dangerous legal drugs alcohol and tobacco. The arrival of the synthetic drugs fentanyl and methamphetamine, which closely resemble heroin and cocaine respectively, has only served to further complicate matters in the minds of the gullible majority. In all this, cannabis emerges as the villain-in-chief, when, in fact, it is the solution to all the problems created by these alternatives that have moved in to take the space created by its prohibition. An example of the media treating opium and cannabis in the same way is the report from The Hindu which states that 'Of the 6.7 million users, 4.25 million were drug dependent. Charas, a resin obtained from marijuana was used by four million people and heroin by 860,000. In addition injecting drug users numbered 430,000. A challenge for Pakistan is the very limited treatment centres, especially for women, he said. With a high number of drug dependents, treatment and specialist intervention was available to less than 30,000 users a year. While poppy is grown in Afghanistan drugs are trafficked through Pakistan. A lot of the heroin and opiates are found here because it is at a crossroads of a big complicated business network as it goes to Europe, Asia and North America.'

The opium-producing regions are also highly suitable for producing some of the best cannabis in the world. Afghanistan produces some of the finest cannabis in the world. Afghan hashish, or charas as it is called in India - the resin derived from the cannabis flower - was legendary until the 19th century. Natural cannabis, of which Afghanistan possesses some of the best varieties, is smuggled by drug cartels to Europe where it is sold at high prices in the thriving medical and recreational cannabis markets. Afghanistan produces the second highest quantity of cannabis resin after Morocco, according to UNODC. Afghanistan was one of the primary sources of cannabis resin to India and, I suspect, a good part of Europe. Cannabis, which is a much better painkiller than opium, and a much better stimulant than methamphetamine, primarily because it is non-addictive and non-lethal, is consistently kept prohibited in Afghanistan as its legalization will overturn the entire outsourcing network for opium and methamphetamine. It will also break the chains that the clerics and the militia hold over the people. It will bring great economic prosperity to Afghanistan and remove the dependency of Afghanistan on the weapons and economic aid provided by such nations as the US, UK, China and India. For this reason, it is of paramount importance to keep cannabis prohibited and the people chained down.

The saddest part of all this is that Afghanistan has been reduced to shambles with terrorist organizations and invading nations using the lucrative heroin trade to fund their various activities. The general population has been reduced to living in war-torn conditions with not a day passing without reports of violence. Heroin has seeped into the society and culture of this country. Where people in earlier times used relatively harmless natural opium, now low grade and highly adulterated heroin is the recreational drug of choice among the masses. The reuse of syringes has fueled a HIV epidemic that is largely unreported and untreated. To make matters worse, if that is even possible, Afghanistan is now emerging as a primary source of methamphetamine that is supplied to Iran and the Middle East. The Lancet reports that in Afghanistan 'In 2010, opioid use and dependence made the largest contribution to morbidity and mortality from illicit drug use, contributing to premature death from drug overdose and suicide, and in those who inject these drugs, infection with HIV and other blood-borne viruses. Dependence also produced considerable disability. Afghanistan has a tradition of opium smoking, and has long been a major source of illegal opiates for eastern and western Europe. In the past decade, Afghans have also reportedly begun to inject heroin and use pharmaceutical opioids. These developments have been attributed to increased heroin availability, civil disruption from insurgency, and the crowding of displaced Afghans into urban areas where heroin and pharmaceutical opioids are readily available.' 

The people of Afghanistan suffer through all this as both natural opium and cannabis are prohibited for local use. The most obvious solution to this problem would be the legalization of both natural cannabis and opium in the country. The farmers could grow it legally, the people could use it in its natural form for recreation and medicine, as has been done traditionally for thousands of years, and the economy would benefit vastly and become sustainable through the global legal trade of opium and cannabis. Opium, however, has a limited amount of uses when compared to the highly versatile cannabis. So, if a choice was to be made, I would choose the legalization of cannabis first for Afghanistan and then the legalization of opium.

Cannabis rivals opium in its painkilling abilities. Besides that, cannabis has a host of other health benefits that opium cannot even come close to. Cannabis is also not addictive. Cannabis rivals cocaine in its properties as a stimulant. The elite opium addicts of the world fear cannabis because they think that legalizing cannabis will eat into their sources of opium supply. In reality, cannabis can exist side by side with opium and even mitigate the harms of opium. The most obvious thing to do would be to legalize opium and regulate it like tobacco and alcohol, with emphasis on the consumption of opium in its natural forms. Tight regulation should be practiced where opium is processed into the synthetic products that make it more potent and lethal. In addition to this, cannabis must be completely legalized so that it can be grown like any other natural agricultural crop. By doing this, natural opium will be available to meet the huge global demand, especially among the vast majority of the people of the world, its poor. Even more than this, cannabis will be available to all so that they have an alternative to opium. Most people in the world have greater intelligence than the elite opium addicts of the world. Most people know the harms of opium and the benefits of cannabis. That is why when neither opium nor cannabis were regulated the vast majority of the people of the world chose cannabis over opium. Doing all this will bring down the global demand and market for the dangerous synthetics methamphetamine and fentanyl.

By taking steps to legalize and regulate opium, and to completely legalize cannabis without any form of regulation, countries like Afghanistan will be able to grow and trade in these produce and revive their economies in sustainable ways, besides improving the health of their people. The vast amounts of money spent in the subterfuge that currently occurs with opium and cannabis trafficking - the political maneuvers, the militia, drug cartels, drug enforcement, excise and so on - can all be eliminated. The rich countries that depend the most on these produce can import them legally and not rob countries like Afghanistan. Cannabis can revolutionize not just medicine and intoxicant in Afghanistan, but also can spawn a whole plethora of sustainable industries in the areas of agriculture, fabrics and textiles, construction, biofuels, food, beverages, wellness, tourism, biodegradable plastics, sustainable paper and packaging, and so on. Sustainable cannabis industries can provide employment for vast numbers of the people of Afghanistan. If the decision makers of Afghanistan recognized the value of the cannabis that the country possesses, in terms of medicinal, recreational, business, industrial, agricultural, environmental and economic value, as well as the reasons for the suffering of the people, they would do well to legalize the plant, allow farmers to grow it and allow its international trade to vastly boost the Afghan economy. It would lift the Afghan people out of the mire of war, heroin and methamphetamine addiction, revolutionize jobs, revive sustainable industry and vastly boost public health.

But then legalization of cannabis would also cut into the funding of terror networks. It would reduce arms and heroin trade and the incentive for international armies to station themselves in the country in the name of providing security and rehabilitation for the people. It would cut into the sourcing of opium for global pharmaceutical giants and the illegal heroin industry. It would mean the end of all conflicts which are kept alive only to hide the underlying exploitation of the land and its people for the big businesses of the world like the drug and arms industries.  Now, which Afghan government would be willing to do something like that, to try and uproot all these diseases that have taken deep root in the Afghan nation, when it could mean a stop in the inflow of alms in the form of international aid that these so called well-wishers of the country provide and which flows into the pockets of the elite leaving the vast majority of the people worse off than they were? It would need to be a truly special government, one that really cared for the people, the land, the environment and believed in the Afghan nation, peace and a sustainable world.

Since the elites of the world have an insatiable addiction for opium and cocaine, and a possibly even greater greed to profit from opium and cocaine, they screw themselves and everybody else through all the orifices possible. What should we call this behaviour of the elite opium addicts of the world - infantile or imbecile or insane? It is possibly a combination of all three.

In December 2020, the UN voted to remove cannabis from its most restricted schedule of the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. Cannabis does however still remain in its least restrictive schedule, thus more or less maintaining the current status quo around cannabis prohibition and access for the common man. This one move by the UN itself should be sufficient to bring about the recreational legalization of cannabis in every nation and an overhaul of national drug laws. It must be noted that in most places where cannabis legalization has happened it took the efforts of the people who mobilized themselves through grassroots-level movements to bring about this change. Left to lawmakers legalization would have been impossible, as the main interests of lawmakers concern the protection of the big industries opposed to cannabis such as pharmaceuticals, petrochemicals, medical, alcohol and tobacco. For something that truly benefits the people, the people themselves have had to make the change.


Related articles


Listed below are articles taken from various media related to the above subject. Words in italics are the thoughts of your truly at the time of reading the article.    



'Of the 6.7 million users, 4.25 million were drug dependent. Charas, a resin obtained from marijuana was used by four million people and heroin by 860,000. In addition injecting drug users numbered 430,000.

A challenge for Pakistan is the very limited treatment centres, especially for women, he said. With a high number of drug dependents, treatment and specialist intervention was available to less than 30,000 users a year.

While poppy is grown in Afghanistan drugs are trafficked through Pakistan.

A lot of the heroin and opiates are found here because it is at a crossroads of a big complicated business network as it goes to Europe, Asia and North America.'




'The world’s single largest heroin trafficking route continues to be the Balkan route, which takes heroin from Afghanistan to markets in Western and Central Europe via Iran (the Islamic Republic of), Turkey and the Balkans. This route accounted for 58 per cent of the heroin seizures made outside Afghanistan in 2018.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'Opium is illicitly produced in some 50 countries worldwide, although the three countries where most opium is produced have accounted for about 97 per cent of global opium production over the past five years. Afghanistan, the country where most opium is produced, which has accounted for approximately 84 per cent of global opium production over the past five years, supplies markets in neighbouring countries, Europe, the Near and Middle East, South Asia and Africa and to a small degree North America (notably Canada) and Oceania. Countries in SouthEast Asia – mostly Myanmar (some 7 per cent of global opium production) and, to a lesser extent, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (about 1 per cent of global opium production) – supply markets in East and South-East Asia and Oceania. Countries in Latin America – mostly Mexico (6 per cent of global opium production) and, to a far lesser extent, Colombia and Guatemala (less than 1 per cent of the global total) – account for most of the heroin supply to the United States and supply the comparatively small heroin markets of South America.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'Despite a long-term upward trend, the global area under opium poppy cultivation declined by 17 per cent in 2018 and then by 30 per cent in 2019, falling to an estimated 240,800 ha. Declines in the area under cultivation were reported in both Afghanistan and Myanmar in 2018 and 2019. Despite the recent declines, the global area under opium poppy cultivation is nevertheless still substantially larger than a decade ago and at similar level of the global area under coca cultivation' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'Despite global opium production in 2018 being less than in 2017, there have been no indications to date of a shortage in the supply of heroin to the respective consumer markets. In 2018 and 2019, both opium and heroin prices declined in the main opium production areas in Afghanistan, with opium farmgate prices falling by an average of 37 per cent (on a year earlier) in 2018 and by 24 per cent in 2019, while high-quality heroin prices fell by an average of 11 per cent in 2018 and by 27 per cent in 2019 in Afghanistan. Due to the bumper opium harvest of 2017, opium prices showed significant declines at an earlier stage (starting in 2017) than did heroin prices (basically starting in 2018), suggesting that it may have taken some time for clandestine heroin manufacture to adjust to the overall greater availability of opium before expanding, as later reflected in lower heroin prices. At the same time, data also show that, following two years of decreased opium production as compared with 2017, the downward trend in drug prices came to a halt, in the case of opium, in June 2019, and a few months later, in August 2019, in the case of heroin as well.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'The largest quantities of both opium and morphine seized were reported by the Islamic Republic of Iran, followed by Afghanistan and Pakistan, while seizures reported by other countries remained comparatively modest. The largest total quantity of heroin seized by a country in 2018 was that seized by the Islamic Republic of Iran (for the first time since 2014), followed by Turkey, the United States, China, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Belgium.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020, 



'Almost 70 per cent of the global quantities of heroin and morphine (the two main internationally trafficked opiates) seized in 2018 were intercepted in Asia, mostly in South-West Asia. The two subregions surrounding Afghanistan, South-West Asia and Central Asia, together accounted for more than 56 per cent of the global quantity of heroin and morphine seized

 Despite the decline in 2018, the overall trend in seizures of heroin and morphine in that subregion continued to be an upward one over the period 2008–2018. South-West Asia continued to account for the majority of the global quantities of heroin and morphine seized globally in 2018 (close to 56 per cent), with the largest quantities seized being reported by the Islamic Republic of Iran, followed by Afghanistan and Pakistan.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'The world’s single largest heroin trafficking route continues to be the so-called “Balkan route”, along which opiates from Afghanistan are shipped to Iran (Islamic Republic of), Turkey, the Balkan countries and to various destinations in Western and Central Europe. Not counting seizures made in Afghanistan itself, countries along the Balkan route accounted for 58 per cent of the global quantities of heroin and morphine seized in 2018. A further 8 per cent of those global seizures were reported by countries in Western and Central Europe, whose markets are supplied to a great degree by heroin and morphine that is trafficked along the Balkan route' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020, 



'In line with the dominance of the opium production in Afghanistan, quantities of heroin and morphine seized related to Afghan opiate production accounted for some 84 per cent of the global total in 2018, a slight decrease from 88 per cent in 2017, the year of the bumper harvest in the country. Most of the heroin found in Europe, Central Asia/ Transcaucasia and Africa is derived from opium of Afghan origin, accounting for 100 per cent of all mentions in the responses to the annual report questionnaire by countries in Central Asia/Transcaucasia, 96 per cent in Europe and 87 per cent in Africa over the period 2014–2018.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'The Islamic Republic of Iran reported that 75 per cent of the morphine and 75 per cent of the heroin seized on its territory in 2018 had been trafficked via Pakistan, while the remainder had been smuggled directly into the country from Afghanistan. Typically, heroin is then smuggled to Turkey (70 per cent of all the heroin seized in the Islamic Republic of Iran in both 2016 and 2017) and from there along the Balkan route to Western and Central Europe, either via the western branch of the route via Bulgaria to various western Balkan countries or, to a lesser extent, via the eastern branch of the route via Bulgaria and then to Romania and Hungary, before reaching the main consumer markets in Western and Central Europe' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'The region with the next largest number of methamphetamine laboratories dismantled was Asia, accounting for 6 per cent of the global total in the period 2014–2018. Most of these facilities were dismantled in China and the Islamic Republic of Iran, which together accounted for 94 per cent of all reported laboratories dismantled in Asia, while some clandestine methamphetamine laboratories were also dismantled, in descending order of importance, in Malaysia, the Philippines, Indonesia, India, the Republic of Korea, Myanmar and Hong Kong, China. In addition, the clandestine manufacture of methamphetamine has been reported in recent years by Afghanistan and Iraq.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'Similar to the situation in the United States, where the manufacture of methamphetamine declined while increasing in neighbouring Mexico, both China and Iran (Islamic Republic of) reported declining domestic production, reflected in the decreasing numbers of methamphetamine laboratories dismantled in recent years, going hand in hand with the expansion of methamphetamine manufacture in their neighbouring countries. Indeed, by 2018 the Islamic Republic of Iran reported that most of the methamphetamine found on its territory originated in Afghanistan and was trafficked either from there directly or via Pakistan. Similarly, China reported that methamphetamine seized in recent years has originated primarily in Myanmar. In contrast to many other countries, however, the marked declines in the domestic manufacture of methamphetamine in China appear to have more than outweighed any increase in clandestine manufacture and imports from neighbouring countries. This is revealed in the decline in methamphetamine found in the wastewater in cities across China, with wastewater-based estimates suggesting a fall in methamphetamine consumption amounts of 26 per cent over the period 2014 –2018' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'Most of the clandestine methamphetamine manufacture in the Near and Middle East/South-West Asia has traditionally been in the Islamic Republic of Iran, being manufactured both for the local market and for export to countries in East and South-East Asia (including Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand) as well as for export to Central Asia and the Caucasus (Azerbaijan, Georgia and Tajikistan) and to Europe (including Bulgaria, France, the Russian Federation, Turkey and the United Kingdom). However, the Islamic Republic of Iran is not the main source of the methamphetamine found in other countries in the Near and Middle East/SouthWest Asia (with the exception of Iraq and the Syrian Arab Republic). The main source countries for other countries in this subregion seem to continue to be countries in East and South-East Asia. The extent of clandestine methamphetamine manufacture in the Islamic Republic of Iran actually appears to be declining, while manufacturing is rapidly increasing in neighbouring Afghanistan.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'Much of the methamphetamine production in these subregions was originally intended for exports to the rapidly growing markets of East and South-East Asia, but domestic markets also appear to have started to emerge in the Near and Middle East/ South-West Asia in recent years. Of 15 reporting countries in these subregions, 12 countries reported the use of methamphetamine by 2018 (or the latest year for which data are available). In the absence of scientific data for the Near and Middle East/South-West Asia, qualitative information on trends in methamphetamine use reported by national authorities to UNODC give an indication of the threat experienced by the region. National authorities have reported a clear upward trend in methamphetamine use in those subregions. Methamphetamine appears to have emerged in the Near and Middle East/South-West Asia as the main ATS used in the Islamic Republic of Iran (2009– 2018) as well as in Iraq (2016 and 2017), Lebanon (2014–2017), Bahrein (2016), Afghanistan (2015 and 2016), Israel (2014 and 2015) and Kuwait (2003, 2009, 2013' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'Morocco, with 47,500 ha reported to be under cannabis cultivation in 2018, continues to be the most frequently mentioned source country for cannabis resin worldwide in the annual report questionnaire, being mentioned in more than a fifth of all cases as the main country of origin of cannabis resin seized worldwide over the period 2014–2018; Morocco was followed by Afghanistan, where, a UNODC survey found, in 2010 an area of 9,000–29,000 ha was under cannabis cultivation. Cannabis resin produced in Morocco is mainly destined for other markets in North Africa and markets in Western and Central Europe. Some cannabis resin of Moroccan origin is also trafficked to Eastern Europe and South-Eastern Europe. Most cannabis resin of Moroccan origin destined for Europe is first shipped to Spain, from where it is smuggled to other markets in the region. For many years, including in the period 2014–2018, Spain has been identified by other European countries as the principal country of departure and transit for cannabis resin, followed by the Netherlands.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020, 



'Afghanistan appears to be the second most important source country of cannabis resin worldwide, with 19 per cent of all mentions worldwide in the annual report questionnaire over the period 2014– 2018, followed by Pakistan and Lebanon. The cannabis resin produced in these countries is principally destined for other countries in the Near and Middle East/South-West Asia, although cannabis resin originating in Afghanistan has also been identified in Central Asia, Eastern Europe and Western and Central Europe. The Islamic Republic of Iran reported that the cannabis resin found on its territory originated mainly in Afghanistan (followed by Pakistan), with some 65 per cent destined for countries of the Arabian peninsula, 15 per cent for the Caucasus and some 20 per cent for domestic consumption. Cannabis resin originating in Lebanon is mainly found in the Near and Middle East and, to a lesser extent, in Western and Central Europe.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020, 



Afghanistan and Mexico source the heroin and morphine. Mexico, Thailand, Myanmar and China source the methamphetamine. The Middle East and Eastern Europe sources the amphetamine. The US consumes heroin, cocaine and methamphetamine. Europe consumes heroin, morphine, methamphetamine and amphetamine. Asia consumes heroin, morphine and methamphetamine. Australia consumes methamphetamine. The Middle East consumes heroin and amphetamine. West Asia consumes heroin and methamphetamine. All countries grow and consume cannabis. Opioids, methamphetamine and amphetamines kill the most in terms of drug deaths, cannabis kills none. Who are the leading opponents to cannabis legalization and leading enforcers of global anti-cannabis policy? The countries involved the most in heroin, morphine, amphetamines and methamphetamines. They put on a mask of concern about harms from drugs, produce, sell and consume the most dangerous synthetic drugs and vehemently oppose cannabis legalization worldwide while clandestinely feeding their habits and protecting their sources. They use arms and armies to protect and promote their synthetic drug habits, and drug money to fund and wage a war on cannabis everywhere, pushing man and planet ever closer to death on massive scales and away from the safe, healing cannabis herb...


And you thought that the Americans, Russians, British, Chinese and Indians are in Afghanistan to help the people there re-establish normalcy in their lives...

'Joe Rogan and Abby Martin talks about opium coming from Afghanistan and drug trafficking in America. Also goes into carfentanyl and heroin.'



'Afghanistan has a tradition of opium smoking, and has long been a major source of illegal opiates for eastern and western Europe. In the past decade, Afghans have also reportedly begun to inject heroin and use pharmaceutical opioids. These developments have been attributed to increased heroin availability, civil disruption from insurgency, and the crowding of displaced Afghans into urban areas where heroin and pharmaceutical opioids are readily available.'



'Opium is illicitly produced in some 50 countries worldwide, although the three countries where most opium is produced have accounted for about 97 per cent of global opium production over the past five years. Afghanistan, the country where most opium is produced, which has accounted for approximately 84 per cent of global opium production over the past five years, supplies markets in neighbouring countries, Europe, the Near and Middle East, South Asia and Africa and to a small degree North America (notably Canada) and Oceania. Countries in SouthEast Asia – mostly Myanmar (some 7 per cent of global opium production) and, to a lesser extent, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (about 1 per cent of global opium production) – supply markets in East and South-East Asia and Oceania. Countries in Latin America – mostly Mexico (6 per cent of global opium production) and, to a far lesser extent, Colombia and Guatemala (less than 1 per cent of the global total) – account for most of the heroin supply to the United States and supply the comparatively small heroin markets of South America.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'Despite a long-term upward trend, the global area under opium poppy cultivation declined by 17 per cent in 2018 and then by 30 per cent in 2019, falling to an estimated 240,800 ha. Declines in the area under cultivation were reported in both Afghanistan and Myanmar in 2018 and 2019. Despite the recent declines, the global area under opium poppy cultivation is nevertheless still substantially larger than a decade ago and at similar level of the global area under coca cultivation' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'Despite global opium production in 2018 being less than in 2017, there have been no indications to date of a shortage in the supply of heroin to the respective consumer markets. In 2018 and 2019, both opium and heroin prices declined in the main opium production areas in Afghanistan, with opium farmgate prices falling by an average of 37 per cent (on a year earlier) in 2018 and by 24 per cent in 2019, while high-quality heroin prices fell by an average of 11 per cent in 2018 and by 27 per cent in 2019 in Afghanistan. Due to the bumper opium harvest of 2017, opium prices showed significant declines at an earlier stage (starting in 2017) than did heroin prices (basically starting in 2018), suggesting that it may have taken some time for clandestine heroin manufacture to adjust to the overall greater availability of opium before expanding, as later reflected in lower heroin prices. At the same time, data also show that, following two years of decreased opium production as compared with 2017, the downward trend in drug prices came to a halt, in the case of opium, in June 2019, and a few months later, in August 2019, in the case of heroin as well.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'Most opiates seized are reported in or close to the main opium production areas. Thus Asia, host to more than 90 per cent of global illicit opium production and the world’s largest consumption market for opiates, accounted for almost 80 per cent of all opiates seized worldwide, as expressed in heroin equivalents, in 2018.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'The largest quantities of opiates continued to be seized in South-West Asia in 2018, accounting for 98 per cent of the global quantity of opium seized, 97 per cent of the global quantity of morphine seized and 38 per cent of the global quantity of heroin seized that year (i.e., equivalent to 70 per cent of all opiates seized globally as expressed in heroin equivalents). Overall, 690 tons of opium, 42 tons of morphine and 37 tons of heroin were seized in South-West Asia in 2018' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'The largest quantities of both opium and morphine seized were reported by the Islamic Republic of Iran, followed by Afghanistan and Pakistan, while seizures reported by other countries remained comparatively modest. The largest total quantity of heroin seized by a country in 2018 was that seized by the Islamic Republic of Iran (for the first time since 2014), followed by Turkey, the United States, China, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Belgium.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020, 



'Almost 70 per cent of the global quantities of heroin and morphine (the two main internationally trafficked opiates) seized in 2018 were intercepted in Asia, mostly in South-West Asia. The two subregions surrounding Afghanistan, South-West Asia and Central Asia, together accounted for more than 56 per cent of the global quantity of heroin and morphine seized

Despite the decline in 2018, the overall trend in seizures of heroin and morphine in that subregion continued to be an upward one over the period 2008–2018. South-West Asia continued to account for the majority of the global quantities of heroin and morphine seized globally in 2018 (close to 56 per cent), with the largest quantities seized being reported by the Islamic Republic of Iran, followed by Afghanistan and Pakistan.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'While the strongest increase in the quantities of heroin and morphine seized in 2017 was reported in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe (the same year as the bumper opium harvest reported in Afghanistan), the strongest increase in 2018 was reported in Western and Central Europe (89 per cent). This suggests that it may take a year from when opium is harvested in Afghanistan until it is manufactured into the heroin that ends up on the streets of Western and Central Europe. There were increases in heroin and morphine seizures in Europe in the countries along the Balkan route in 2018, although most of the increase was due to an increase in the quantities of heroin and morphine seized in Belgium and, to a lesser extent, in France and Italy.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020, 



'The world’s single largest heroin trafficking route continues to be the so-called “Balkan route”, along which opiates from Afghanistan are shipped to Iran (Islamic Republic of), Turkey, the Balkan countries and to various destinations in Western and Central Europe. Not counting seizures made in Afghanistan itself, countries along the Balkan route accounted for 58 per cent of the global quantities of heroin and morphine seized in 2018. A further 8 per cent of those global seizures were reported by countries in Western and Central Europe, whose markets are supplied to a great degree by heroin and morphine that is trafficked along the Balkan route' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020, 



'In line with the dominance of the opium production in Afghanistan, quantities of heroin and morphine seized related to Afghan opiate production accounted for some 84 per cent of the global total in 2018, a slight decrease from 88 per cent in 2017, the year of the bumper harvest in the country. Most of the heroin found in Europe, Central Asia/ Transcaucasia and Africa is derived from opium of Afghan origin, accounting for 100 per cent of all mentions in the responses to the annual report questionnaire by countries in Central Asia/Transcaucasia, 96 per cent in Europe and 87 per cent in Africa over the period 2014–2018.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020, 



'In 2010, opioid use and dependence made the largest contribution to morbidity and mortality from illicit drug use, contributing to premature death from drug overdose and suicide, and in those who inject these drugs, infection with HIV and other blood-borne viruses. Dependence also produced considerable disability. Afghanistan has a tradition of opium smoking, and has long been a major source of illegal opiates for eastern and western Europe. In the past decade, Afghans have also reportedly begun to inject heroin and use pharmaceutical opioids. These developments have been attributed to increased heroin availability, civil disruption from insurgency, and the crowding of displaced Afghans into urban areas where heroin and pharmaceutical opioids are readily available.'



'Much of the methamphetamine production in these subregions was originally intended for exports to the rapidly growing markets of East and South-East Asia, but domestic markets also appear to have started to emerge in the Near and Middle East/ South-West Asia in recent years. Of 15 reporting countries in these subregions, 12 countries reported the use of methamphetamine by 2018 (or the latest year for which data are available). In the absence of scientific data for the Near and Middle East/South-West Asia, qualitative information on trends in methamphetamine use reported by national authorities to UNODC give an indication of the threat experienced by the region. National authorities have reported a clear upward trend in methamphetamine use in those subregions. Methamphetamine appears to have emerged in the Near and Middle East/South-West Asia as the main ATS used in the Islamic Republic of Iran (2009– 2018) as well as in Iraq (2016 and 2017), Lebanon (2014–2017), Bahrein (2016), Afghanistan (2015 and 2016), Israel (2014 and 2015) and Kuwait (2003, 2009, 2013' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,



'Surveys of people in hospitals, prisons and other institutions had already revealed the importance of methamphetamine in Iraq as far back as 2012. Along with “captagon” and tramadol, crystalline methamphetamine has emerged as a main drug of concern. A study in 2015 further confirmed those findings, with drug users saying they found cannabis more difficult to get hold of than “captagon” or methamphetamine. More recently, Iraqi authorities have discovered methamphetamine laboratories and, INCB has expressed concern over large-scale imports of pseudoephedrine preparations – used as precursors in methamphetamine laboratories. In Afghanistan, seizures of methamphetamine have steadily risen since 2014, when manufacturing seems to have started. But the amount seized in the first six months of 2019 – 657 kg – signals a huge leap on the previous year. The large seizures effected in other countries of methamphetamine thought to originate in Afghanistan also suggest that production in that country is rising fast.' - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2020,




The Businesses and Power Structure Opposed to Cannabis


 
Who are the opponents to a 28 million years old natural plant like cannabis that has existed on this planet, much before humans even came into the picture? Who are the opponents to a plant - to live with which and to benefit from which - humans and other animals have evolved receptors in many parts of their bodies? Who are the opponents to a plant that has been used as medicine, intoxicant, entheogen and means of livelihood by hundreds of millions of the world's people - often the poorest - across the world for thousands of years? The opponents - afflicted with a kind of madness that sees the world as a bounty to be plundered, entities without a face but massive global financial clout and reach, with a lack of accountability and responsibility for this planet - are today many of the world's largest industries and leaders who see the plant as a threat to their ambitions. 
 
The opposition to cannabis is fueled by selfish interests, ignorance, misinformation, apathy and disinterest. Together the opposition has imprisoned or put to death millions of individuals who love the plant. Cannabis has been replaced by petrochemical based non-biodegradable plastics, dangerous compounds and synthetic materials that have polluted our natural world leaving no place left uncontaminated today. Millions have been denied access to the plant and have been led down the path of addiction to pharmaceutical drugs, methamphetamine, heroin and other opioids, cocaine, synthetic cannabinoidsalcohol, tobacco and novel psychotropic substances. Many poor farmers, rural communities and indigenous people have been forced to take up unsustainable crops for agriculture and eventually been driven to shanty towns, ghettos and slums in cities where they await their deaths in the middle of a hellish existence far removed from nature. Millions, and very possibly billions, face numerous physical and mental illnesses that could have been prevented by or treated with the cannabis plant.Today, alcohol and tobacco are the default legal drugs provided by the power structures for the majority of the world. Both drugs taking lives by the millions each year. Unknown varieties of the precious cannabis plant have been exterminated and gone extinct worldwide while many varieties lead precarious existences.

So again, who are the opponents of cannabis? Broadly we can classify them into two categories - the Businesses and the Power Structures that enable them. The Power Structures put in place laws and ensure that the laws are enforced to protect the Businesses. The Businesses control and influence the Power Structures, do whatever it takes to ensure that the laws are in their favor, and ensure that anybody who appears to be a threat is promptly suppressed. 
 
One can gauge the power of an entity by the nature of the adversaries who wish it dead. So when the Businesses, world's biggest industries today - fossil fuel based petrochemicals and the allied industries of non-biodegradable plastics, synthetic fabricschemical fertilizers and pesticides, and construction; the synthetic pharmaceutical industry; the medical industry; the black market for illegal synthetic drugs; alcohol; tobacco; opium; timber-based paper; etc, fear an adversary and employ all the tools of the Power Structure - politicians, law enforcement and judiciarydrug enforcementmediareligious orthodoxy and the armed forces - to keep the adversary down, then that adversary is nothing short of phenomenal. That, my dear friends and foes, is the power of cannabis. Is it any wonder, then, that cannabis is the favorite herb of Siva, the great god?
 
Let us take a closer look at some of these Businesses and components of the Power Structure.

The Businesses

Let us look at the Businesses that are the biggest opponents of cannabis. Many of them have emerged to fill the vacuum created after the prohibition of cannabis, while others have been directly involved in bringing about the prohibition of cannabis so that they can grow without the competition. All these industries are the world's largest industries now, with most of them having the word 'Big' prefixed to them.

The Fossil Fuel Industry
First we have the mammoth fossil fuel industry that entails coal, petrochemicals, and natural gas. Cannabis based materials are natural and organic and are perceived as threats to the industries that create synthetic materials using fossil fuels and its by-products. Natural cannabis for industries such as biodegradable plastic, biofuels, fabrics, construction material, cosmetics and other organic products have been phased out . Synthetics including petrochemical based non-biodegradable plastic, chemical fertilizers and pesticides, textiles, construction material and hydrocarbon fuels now dominate industry. Pretty much every industry has seen the impact of this. The fossil fuel industry and its ancillaries are quite easily the largest in the world today and responsible for the most damage to the world. This industry is, I suspect, the most vociferous opposition to cannabis. Is it any wonder that Iran, the US, Saudi Arabia, Russia, China and Nigeria so vehemently oppose the legalization of cannabis by the UN?

The Synthetic Pharmaceutical Industry
Then we have Big Pharma. The legalization of cannabis will spell the death knell for whole categories of drugs that Big Pharma relies on to bring in its vast profits. There is good reason for the synthetic pharmaceutical industry to fear cannabis like nothing else it has faced ever before. In US states and Canada where cannabis has been legalized, the biggest losers have been the synthetic pharmaceutical companies, as users substitute whole classes of synthetic pharmaceutical drugs - analgesics, anxiolytics, anti-depressants, anti-cancer medicines, anti-psychotics, anti-epileptic medicine, muscle relaxants, sedatives, anti-stress medication, anti-convulsants, glaucoma medication, diabetes medicines, nausea suppressants, aphrodisiacs, digestives,  ADD/ADHD, etc. - with cannabis. Just the hugely profitable painkiller industry which relies massively on opium based drugs may end up becoming extinct. Opium stood to gain immensely in the late 19th century and early 20th century when cannabis was prohibited first in Burma (today's Myanmar), Greece and India and then slowly around the world while opium from  China, Iran and Afghanistan took hold. When you look at the 30 plus medical conditions (and counting), for which cannabis can be prescribed now in 38 US states, pretty much the world's entire big pharma will need to reinvent itself with world wide cannabis legalization. Any wonder then that Japan, China, France, Indiathe US and the UK - countries that boast of some of the world's biggest pharmaceutical companies - are all strongly opposed to cannabis ?
 
Opium
Opium affects all classes of society, though it is predominantly the wealthy classes, and the rich upper middle classes, that are the major consumers and victims. Yes, there are persons from the poorer classes who use opium, but they are mostly concentrated around the cultivation areas where access to raw opium is easier for the poor. Once the raw opium starts moving and getting processed, the poor hardly get a glimpse of it. This is because opioids are priced in such a way that only those with the money can afford to abuse it. That is why the global opium industry is so powerful. The leading revenue earners from opium and its derivatives, are the legal and illegal pharmaceutical companies, and those involved in its illegal trafficking. The global opium market runs in hundreds of billions of dollars, at the least. The opium distribution from crop to final product is a well-oiled process that involves cultivation in poor countries, processing in more advanced countries and then distribution to the world's rich and powerful through the legal and illegal networks. The legal network consists of pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies, pharmacies and physicians. The pharmaceutical companies manufacture the opioids - primarily as pain killers - and stock it with the pharmacists. When the limits of opium tolerance or finances are reached, the user quite often turns to the illegal market for more potent opioids. Depending on the buying power of the individual, the type of opioid consumed will vary. The well-heeled will go for heroin or morphine, and even be fooled into buying fentanyl derivatives these days. Others will search for morphine, oxycodone, methadone, hydrocodone, etc., in the market. The poorer will look for codeine-based cough syrups and tramadol. The global opium industry ensures that it has enough product to cater to most of these categories. India is the world's biggest producer of legal opium. Today, the illegal cultivation of opium globally is, of course, mainly concentrated in MyanmarAfghanistanColombia and now Mexico. In Afghanistan, the major opium consuming nations - the USRussia and UK - have taken turns in invading and controlling the country. The military puppet rulers in Myanmar - with their strings pulled by China - keep the Myanmar opium cultivation regulated.
 
Alcohol
Next we have alcohol. When the British stepped up prohibition of cannabis in India in the late 19th century, one of the primary reasons was that cannabis was very cheap, could be grown anywhere and provided intoxication for the majority of the working classes, whereas western alcohol was more an upper class drink, much more expensive than cannabis. Despite widespread reports regarding the harms of alcohol as compared to cannabis, the higher revenue potential of alcohol was sufficient ground for the government to bring about cannabis prohibition in India, and to force the population to take up alcohol and opium. In the west, alcohol emerged from the prohibition misadventure in the US in the 1930s, needing a leg up to find its feet once again, and the US federal government gladly obliged by banning cannabis. Alcohol industries now massively fund governments as well as rake in vast profits due to the number of people world wide who consume it. The deaths, crime, violence, physical and mental health issues due to alcohol notwithstanding, no government has deemed it necessary that cannabis as a harm reduction mechanism should be legalized. Countries with leading alcohol industries such as the US, UK France, Italy, Russia, Australia, are strongly opposed to world wide legalization of cannabis.

Tobacco
Next we have tobacco. This is another industry that vastly profited from the prohibition of cannabis. Many more people smoked cannabis than did tobacco at the start of the 20th century, especially in places like India. The discovery of tobacco in the Americas by Europeans led to the European push to convert all smokers to tobacco. Many of the leaders and most influential people in the US, Britain and Canada had large tobacco plantations that they were keen on profiting from. Today's tobacco companies have grown to such monstrous proportions, killing millions world wide each year, that all who promoted it in the past are now trying all they can (at least in public) to rein in tobacco. The tobacco story is more or less a parallel of the alcohol story.

The Medical Industry
The medical industry with its network of physicians, medical bodies, hospitals and treatment centers are a key opponent to cannabis. A person growing cannabis at home, and smoking it, is highly unlikely to want to visit a physician or get admitted to a hospital for treatment with synthetic pharmaceutical drugs. A joint a day will keep the doctor (and hospital) away in many cases. The number of ailments for which cannabis now qualifies as a cure in American and European countries is likely to render vast numbers of physicians and treatment centers redundant. The cannabis based range of disease treatments cover nearly all aspects of the human body and mind, as well as all age groups, genders and ethnic backgrounds. In fact, cannabis is universal medicine for mammals in general, meaning that even the veterinary medical industry would have to reinvent itself with worldwide cannabis legalization. But since the medical industry is largely supported by the pharma industry and governments, and it is an industry after all - with profits as the key motivation rather than universal health - it stands opposed to cannabis, irrespective of the amount of scientific facts presented to it. The medical industry was instrumental in bringing about cannabis prohibition in 19th century India, when it falsely linked cannabis usage with insanity. Using the false data of this linkage that emerged from the lunatic asylums of India, the medical industry was instrumental in spreading the cannabis causes insanity myth across the world, convincing most nations to prohibit cannabis.

The Black Market for Illegal Synthetic Drugs
Most black market operations involving cannabis these days are multi-member network based operations, often spanning multiple geographies, interstate and international. Cannabis is usually just one of the activities that these operations are involved in. Hard drugs - heroin, methamphetamine, synthetic cannabinoids, novel psychotropic substances and cocaine, weapons, money, illegal wildlife, and human trafficking form other parts of the diverse business portfolio. Almost all operations function in connivance with politicians, law enforcement, drug enforcement and excise officials. 90% or more of worldwide cannabis trade is through the black market, and global spend on trying to curb this, which is a racket in itself, is said to be in the range of hundreds of billions of dollars. The small farmer with his limited produce has very limited chances of survival in this setting. Often difficult circumstances force him to join the crime networks, where he ends up becoming a victim of serious exploitation, enslaved to provide the elites their fix. With legalization of cannabis, the legal market for cannabis overtook the black market for it within three years in Canada. Legalization of cannabis will not only shrink the black market for it, but will also reduce the demand for the more dangerous synthetic drugs that exist because of cannabis prohibition. 

The Paper Industry
Then we have the paper industry or should we say Big Timber. You may find it almost unbelievable in hindsight that this industry actively fought cannabis which was initially the predominant material used for paper making at the turn of the 20th century. Paper from cannabis is vastly sustainable since the cannabis crop could be regrown quickly within months to replenish the raw material needed to make paper. Instead the timber industry decided that felling trees that had stood for hundreds of years and which could never be replaced once lost was the way to go to make paper. The trend still continues today. The paper I use to roll my joints is made of hemp because it is slow burning. Hemp based paper can be used for all sorts of purposes - currency, newsprint, packaging, etc., - all sourced from a cannabis crop that can be harvested more than once a year, a cannabis crop that sequesters more carbon than a tropical forest of equivalent space, a crop that restores soil fertility while consuming much less water than most other agricultural crops, a crop capable of growing in the most diverse conditions.

The Arms Industry
The global arms industry may not seem like an obvious competitor. It is well known that consumption of cannabis vastly reduces aggressive behavior. Societies that tone down aggressive behaviors have less need for weapons and arms. If you look at the world's biggest arms manufacturers, sellers and buyers, you will find that these are located in the very same countries most opposed to cannabis legalization, protecting the petrochemical industries and other opponents of cannabis. Countries like Saudi Arabia, India, China, France, US, Russia, Israel are among the top arms trading countries of the world. You could say that the arms industry thrives on the anxiety, fear, stress and conflict it creates in  the world and the assurance of security it provides with arms through governments for petrochemical and legal/illegal pharmaceutical industries.  The arms industry will stand to lose vastly if countries start adopting peaceful and non-aggressive mindsets as well as reducing their dependence on opium and petrochemicals and it is in their biggest interest to keep the levels of aggression at the highest possible level by playing every side against everybody else.They work very well with governments on this front.
 
The Medical Cannabis Industry
Strange as it may seem, big cannabis could also be an opponent of cannabis. It all depends on how big cannabis plays out. If cannabis businesses grow large and can only be set up by those willing to pay high license costs, while a economically poor individual is unable to set up a cannabis business, then big cannabis is an opponent. If big cannabis corners cultivation areas and drives out the poor farmer through its connections with the government and regulators then big cannabis is an opponent. If big cannabis uses its financial clout to patent cannabis strains and plays a hand in reducing the diversity of cannabis plants, promoting only the ones that it deals in, then it is an opponent. If big cannabis plays a part in making cannabis inaccessible and not affordable to each and every individual in this world while making it available only to persons willing to pay high prices then it is an opponent. Already there are increasingly worrying signs of big cannabis businesses cultivating their patented strains on large pieces of land in poorer nations, then exporting their produce to richer European nations and American nations or for the use of large pharmaceutical companies, while the local people continue to remain without access and the local farmers continue to be prohibited from cultivating their own indigenous strains on their small pieces of land. This is especially the case with the Medical Cannabis Industry which makes cannabis a pharmaceutical product, with medical cannabis companies growing it in poor countries, processing it and packaging it to supply to the rich developed countries, and the ruling classes of all countries, while ensuring that it remains prohibited for adult recreational use, thus keeping it out of the hands of the world's majority - especially the poorest people who need it the most. In a number of US states where medical cannabis was first legalized, the medical cannabis industry opposed adult use legalization. Their fears are not unwarranted, because just like the synthetic pharmaceutical industry they soon found their industry consumed by the adult recreational use legalization.  
 

The Power Structure

The Businesses opposed to cannabis would not have been able to grow and thrive, and reach the monstrous proportions that they have reached today without the aid and support of the Power Structure of society as it stands today. The Businesses have shared a significant amount of the loot that they captured from the earth and its people with the corrupt persons who make up the Power Structure. Thus, both the Businesses and the Power Structure have grown in strength and influence to such levels that they crush the people of the world and the natural world. They enslave the majority of the people of the world, making them work for them, and loot the natural riches of the earth for their own benefit leaving behind a trail of death and destruction, contamination and disease. Numerous species of natural life have gone extinct, and the vast majority of the world's people toil night and day to make the Businesses and Power Structure prosper. Let us look at some of the key elements of the Power Structure.
 
Governments
Governments take the place of dishonor as the foremost perpetrators of cannabis prohibition.  For some time, I thought that the US and  Canada were the places where cannabis prohibition originated. Further reading updated me that in colonial British Burma (today's Myanmar) cannabis was already prohibited in the 1870s, so as to ensure the smooth flow of opium between China and Britain. After experimenting with cannabis prohibition in Burma (today's Myanmar), the British colonists introduced cannabis prohibition in the Bengal Presidency to start with. Then it was gradually prohibited in the other British Provinces and Native States of British India through the 19th and early 20th century, ignoring the recommendations by the Indian Hemp Drug Commission of 1894 against prohibition. The British Government of India made it quite clear that its priorities were greater taxation revenues - through the propagation of alcohol, opium and tobacco - as against the needs of vast sections of the working class, poorer sections of society and religious mendicants who had been consuming the inexpensive and medicinal cannabis for thousands of years. This template of government working with big businesses and using its armies and law enforcement bodies to prohibit cannabis was replicated across the world, spreading to the US and  Canada and eventually the entire world by the 20th century. Governments everywhere decided to back the big businesses and prohibit cannabis - swayed in many cases by the propaganda that had been put together against cannabis based on incorrect and distorted information - and, of course, nudged by the money power of the businesses. Cannabis users worldwide, were some of the most peaceful communities and in many cases they constituted the poorer sections of society without the voice to stop the injustice. Today's governments continue to do all they can to keep cannabis prohibited, despite the vast mountains of evidence showing the error of this, and despite increasing public awareness and demand for cannabis legalization. Nowhere is this more evident than in the US, where about 70% of the public are in favor of cannabis legalization, and where 24 states have already legalized cannabis for adult recreational use. But then the US Federal Government is the one entity in the Power Structure most responsible for the growth and success of the Businesses opposed to cannabis. The US Federal Government more or less created the global prohibition of cannabis, as it stands today, by ensuring the inclusion of cannabis in the global drug laws and then bullying every nation that refused to sign up to cannabis prohibition into doing so. Today the US has the world's biggest synthetic pharmaceutical companies, is the world's biggest consumer of fossil fuels, is the world's biggest polluter, is the world's biggest spender on the arms industry, and the biggest roadblock to cannabis legalization.

Drug Enforcement agencies 
Drug enforcement agencies are also called the Excise department in some places. The father of all drug enforcement agencies, Harry Anslinger was the head of the US Federal Bureau of Narcotics in the 1930s, and is said to have set in motion the world wide prohibition of the plant through the US Marihuana Act of 1937. This was to protect his friends in the alcohol industry re-emerging from prohibition, and the paper and tobacco industries that viewed cannabis as a threat. 'Anslinger’s political influence eventually allowed for laws to be passed that made marijuana use highly restricted and at the same time strangled the emerging hemp industry, to the delight of his industrial backers who were scared of potential competition.' says a report. He is long dead but he has left a legacy that has subsequently evolved into the DEA, NIDA, US Justice Department and the Office of the National Drug Control popularly known as the 'Drug Czar's' office. Globally, these US enforcement agencies have served as the template based on which many governments and the UN have modeled their drug enforcement bodies. The DEA and the Drug Czar's office themselves receive vast amounts of US federal government funding based on their war on drugs and specifically the war on cannabis. This is so much so that budgets, in the order of billions, are unquestioningly allocated with no accountability. These organizations are given free rein to carry out their activities even in other countries, especially in South and Central America. As a result, the US is the world's largest consumer of  heroin and cocaine today. These drug enforcement bodies would stand to see potentially massive cuts in their budget allocations if cannabis was to be federally legalized. The story is the same in every country of the world when it comes to cannabis and drug enforcement budgets.

Law Enforcement and Judiciary
Along with drug enforcement, there is the other executive arm of the government called law enforcement that is meant to address crime in society and ensure that society is a safe place. Law enforcement, at all levels and in all countries, work with the same motivation regarding cannabis as drug enforcement agencies do. Focusing disproportionately on cannabis - which in the first place should not even be considered criminal - and arresting its users to help inflate numbers, secure budgets and avail more resources is common to law enforcement everywhere. In the mean time, attention to the most important aspect of law enforcement is diluted i.e. to serious crime such as violent crime, theft, financial fraud, money laundering, extortion, environmental crime, etc. Law enforcement works with prison institutions to ensure that a steady supply of prisoners - mostly poor, minority or indigenous cannabis users - fill prisons to capacity ensuring higher budget allocations to both law enforcement and prison systems. Law enforcement works with governments and big businesses, protecting them and glossing over their organized crimes, while presenting a picture of zeal and efficiency by targeting cannabis and its users who are the victims in all situations. Everywhere law enforcement is one of the most vociferous opponents of cannabis legalization, resisting cannabis legalization the most, insisting that legalization will increase crime rates. The American prison system is said to be an industry of privately run prison institutions. They are for profit and their revenues are dependent on the number of prisoners they house. It is directly in their benefit to have the maximum number of persons within their prisons for the maximum length of time. This industry has evolved to such an extent that the US has the world's highest incarceration rates. Prisons and the law enforcement bodies that supply prisoners to these institutions benefit greatly from keeping cannabis illegal since a significant number of convictions are cannabis related. This is very likely the case in many prisons around the world.

The Religious Orthodoxy
Bizarrely, or maybe not so, conservative religious organizations oppose cannabis. Whether this is because of opposition to all things recreational and pleasurable - such as alcohol, tobacco, sex, music and cannabis or a very specific fear of cannabis making a person prefer introspective personal religion to the social and organizational religion which money-making religious organizations are - is worth pondering over. It could just be that the donations from wealthy individuals who, in turn, work for big businesses fuels the religious bodies opposition to cannabis. The funny thing is that the founding father of nearly every religion was probably a cannabis smoker. For the religious orthodoxy, rulers and businessmen of all  religions - the people who are the most ardent devotees of material wealth and power, the people who benefit most from the rigid caste and class systems, the people who wish to keep the knowledge of one's divinity away from the lower classes and castes so that the upper classes can continue to play out the charade of brokers between god and man - the use of ganja is a direct threat to all that they wish to establish and strengthen. Thus, the religious orthodoxy of all religions, along with the rulers and businessmen of these religions, try and remove ganja from the equation.

The Media
Many of the places where cannabis legalization has happened, are places where media and press freedoms are high. Increased awareness and an independent media, tuned into the pulse of the people, have fueled the rapid legalization of the plant in a positive feedback cycle between public opinion and the media. In general, the media in any place is a distillation of the mindset of its society. In places where there is a vibrant and diverse society, the media is likely to be similarly vibrant, thought provoking and unbiased. In places with regressive and intolerant societies, the media is likely to be the same, with maybe one or two exceptions that dare to go against the grain and often paying a high price for it.. Societies and their media feed off each other. In most parts of the world however, media freedoms are restricted by lawmakers, and even more so by media house owners, who are involved in other big businesses, or receive significant funding from businesses and governments opposed to cannabis. Tight control, driven by misinformation about cannabis users and by the plant's illegal status, and priorities like getting rich and profitable prevent the media from talking positively about the plant or highlighting the harms to society due to the plant's prohibition.
 
Cannabis Prohibition Advocacy Groups
All cannabis prohibition advocacy groups are funded and employed by industries opposed to cannabis - the synthetic pharmaceutical industry, fossil fuel industry, medical industry, alcohol, tobacco and opium industries - or funded and employed by the tools these industries use to control the power structures of the world today - politicians, media, religious orthodoxy, law enforcement and judiciary, drug enforcement, the armed forces, the black market, etc. The job of cannabis prohibition groups is to continuously spew out unscientific nonsense and lies regarding cannabis to keep society afraid of the herb. They prey upon the common fears of society and create myths that amplify these fears, connecting cannabis to the fears and ensuring that the propaganda is loud, widespread and relentless. With the funding that they receive they organize campaigns to spread misinformation among the public. The myths that cannabis prohibition groups typically propagate against cannabis are: cannabis is harmful and addictive; cannabis causes insanity; cannabis fuels crime; only the dregs of society use cannabis; cannabis is the devil's weed; cannabis destroys youth; cannabis causes traffic-related road fatalities; cannabis affects tourism; THC is a most harmful cannabinoid and must be permanently banned or kept under tight regulation; women who use cannabis are immoral; etc. 

The Armed Forces
The armed forces are mainly used by governments to protect the very same industries that we are talking about being replaced by cannabis. The armed forces are mostly used to suppress the very people who grow and consume cannabis, the working classes of society whose freedoms governments choose to restrict through armies. So a return to cannabis by the armed forces would mean an essential transformation at all levels, a major upheaval. Such an upheaval may go down right to the core of the armed forces and bring to surface questions that all armed organizations ultimately fear confronting, which is of their necessity to society. The Arms Industry in particular will be badly hit if the armed forces become a part of the legalized cannabis society, at least, they fear that it will be so. Hence, through its role as protector of governments and the industries opposed to cannabis, the armed forces could be included in the Power Structure that works to keep cannabis prohibited.
 
 
So, there you go. The above are some of the entities - the Businesses and the Power Structure - opposed to cannabis, working actively to keep the plant prohibited. 
 
Despite the collective effort of all these entities over the last 150 years, despite these entities having grown to the stature of the world's biggest, most powerful and influential industries in the world today, despite the men who run these industries becoming the richest people in the world today, and despite the control over the power structures of the world today, these entities have not been able to remove cannabis from their picture of how the world must be. Cannabis is still the world's most widely used illegal intoxicant, used by 250+ million people as per official numbers. The real numbers are easily more than double this. Cannabis is cultivated in more than 150 countries. Not only have the adversaries of cannabis not been able to eliminate it, they are now, in fact, seeing its unstoppable re-emergence that sounds the death knell for them. Two of the G7 nations - Canada and Germany - have now legalized it for adult recreational use, after Uruguay became the first nation to legalize it. Malta and Luxembourg have legalized recreational cannabis for adult use, as have 24 US states at the time of writing. The Supreme Court of Mexico and the Constitutional Court of South Africa have ruled that the prohibition of cannabis violates the fundamental rights of the individual. The UN re-scheduling cannabis from its most restrictive category to its least restrictive category of controlled substances in December 2020.
 
Some of the major opponents of cannabis - the synthetic pharmaceutical industry, fossil fuel industry, medical industry and politicians - got together in 2020 to create the biggest scam in the history of the world. They created a fake pandemic called Covid and managed to effectively fool the entire population of the world. The results of this scam were vastly beneficial to the conspirators, namely: authoritarian governments in the countries most responsible for the scam - China, Russia, Indiathe US and the UK - used the fake pandemic to suppress rising dissent against the government; the synthetic pharmaceutical industry sold huge amounts of their stock of drugs across whole categories - analgesics, antibiotics, antivirals, antihistamines, steroids, opioids, antifungals, anticoagulants - besides newly developed vaccines meant to address the fake pandemic; the petrochemical industry sold face masks, sanitizers, PPE kits, test kits, medical equipment, disinfectants across the world to nearly every person who could afford it; the medical industry fleeced the public by creating special facilities for the fake pandemic and maximizing the use of ICUs, ventilators, oxygen supplies, oximeters, etc., besides hospitalizing anybody who had money or medical insurance coverage, pumping these victims with entire cocktails of drugs and only releasing them after they were dead. This attack on the people of the world by these entities opposed to cannabis went on for two years before the people of the world revolted and tried to get back to their lives. By this time, the wealth of the richest people in the world had doubled - just in the space of two years. Hundreds of millions were pushed to poverty. The gap between the rich and the poor widened like never before. Till date, almost nobody seems to understand that they were victims of a scam on unprecedented scales. Most people still think that they faced a pandemic and were saved by the very people who looted and murdered them.

The wave of cannabis legalization that is emerging globally is a grassroots level movement of people especially individuals who are relatively immune to these big opponents and their financial clout. That is why cannabis legalization is a people's movement that most big businesses and political leaders oppose till they are forced to concede through the sheer volume of public opinion. Realizing the futility of going against the wisdom of the vast majority of educated and informed people, who these days have access to information and facts like never before, many of these opponents are starting to realize that it is time to reinvent their approaches. Many big industries like pharma, tobacco and alcohol have started to explore ways to work with the emerging legal cannabis industry. Many politicians are starting to realize that funding from these big businesses may not be enough to win elections if the overwhelming majority of people around the world stand for  recreational cannabis legalization, as opposed to these big businesses and their unethical, unsustainable and harmful functioning.  
 
The war between cannabis and its opponents is the war between the world's rich ruling classes and castes that make up not more than 10% and the rest of the people of the world who make up the 90%. It is a war between human made destruction and nature. The outcome is certain and inevitable. Nature always wins. It is only a question of how much pain, suffering and death we want to put ourselves through before we recognize this reality. The sooner we do it, the better for all concerned. The rallying cry for the French Revolution was 'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity or Death'. Everyone seems to have forgotten the last part of the call. It is time for the opponents of cannabis to recognize what is at stake, and what the inevitable outcome will be. It is even more important for the 90% of the world who sit on the fence to recognize that the more they delay the return of cannabis, the more their suffering will be, and the longer it will take to heal and restore nature...The power is in the hands of this 90% of the world's people who would surely want a world that is liveable in for humans - even if not for themselves then at least for their children and grandchildren...The cannabis plant is 28 million years old, and will be around long after humans have disappeared from the earth...It is only a question of making our own lives, and the lives of numerous other living species on earth and facing the consequences of human greed and folly, liveable or hell...Today, as I write this, India faces a heat wave like never before, and my city Bengaluru reels under a water crisis, the likes of which it has never seen. The story is the same in most parts of the world with unprecedented droughts, heat waves, floods and hurricanes. The opponents of cannabis however continue like nothing has changed. They continue to do all they can to keep cannabis - the one thing that can save and heal the world from all the damage created by these industries - prohibited, spreading the same lies and misinformation that they used in the first place to get it banned. Most people in the world continue to believe these opponents of cannabis...

Related Articles

Listed below are articles taken from various media related to the above subject. Words in italics are the thoughts of your truly at the time of reading the article


'Anslinger’s political influence eventually allowed for laws to be passed that made marijuana use highly restricted and at the same time strangled the emerging hemp industry, to the delight of his industrial backers who were scared of potential competition.'
http://www.pnas.org/content/110/43/17165


'Even with the changing viewpoint on marijuana legalization, there are some rather large opponents actively lobbying to keep marijuana out of reach. You may not be surprised by some of them, like the alcohol/beer lobby or big PhRMA (flashback 1990’s pharmaceutical companies reassured the medical industry that patients would not become addicted to opioid pain relievers), but private prison corporations are in the mix as well, providing a significant amount of campaign dollars to lawmakers.'
https://newfrontierdata.com/marijuana-insights/the-fight-for-weed/


'Volkow said she worries people who substitute marijuana for the Food and Drug Administration-approved medications buprenorphine, methadone and naltrexone might be more likely to relapse.

"If you don’t treat it properly, your risk of dying is quite high," Volkow told the USA TODAY Editorial Board in a wide-ranging interview. "My main concern is by basically misinforming potential patients about the supposedly beneficial effects of cannabis, they may forgo a treatment that is lifesaving."'
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2019/03/20/weed-marijuana-cannabis-opioid-addiction-withdrawal-nida-nora-volkow/3221792002/


'Meanwhile, the largest committee working against the initiative, Healthy and Productive Michigan, is reporting a sizable new contribution of $75,000 from national prohibition organization Smart Approaches to Marijuana, which has already provided over $1 million in cash and in-kind services to the effort. The prohibitionist committee also reported $100,000 from Dow Chemical Corporation.'
https://www.marijuanamoment.net/more-money-flows-to-michigan-and-missouri-marijuana-ballot-initiative-campaigns/


Local, state and national governments worldwide that oppose marijuana legalization and the international bodies that they constitute such as the UN, IMF and WHO, are funded by industries that view marijuana legalization as a threat. The arms, pharmaceutical, petrochemical, alcohol, tobacco, soda and illegal drugs industries are some of the key funders of these governments and their opposition to marijuana legalization...


And while Hearst had paper in mind, plastic manufacturing companies joined the “Let’s get hemp banned” party to ensure that their petrochemical-based plastics had a leg up over bio-degradable hemp-made plastics. The alcohol and tobacco industries also contribute astronomical sums to fund the “Weed is a dangerous narcotic drug” canard with absolutely zero sense of irony and the pharma industry would prefer that you buy expensive pain killer drugs instead of chewing on some bhang .'
https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-sundaymagazine/rite-of-passage/article5643862.ece


'On consecutive days last week, Texas voters and President Trump effectively eliminated two of the legalized cannabis industry’s most significant political opponents, and advocates and investors took notice. In Tuesday’s elections, Democratic challenger and former NFL player and civil rights attorney Colin Allred upset 22-year incumbent Rep. Pete Sessions (R) to represent Texas’ 32nd District. Being the powerful chairman of the House Rules Committee, Sessions refused to advance any pro-cannabis bills, stymying both new legislation and roll-backs through amendments.

On Wednesday, post-election headlines were overshadowed by news that Attorney General Jeff Sessions (no relation) was resigning at the president’s request. Though most of the immediate buzz revolved around implications for special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, cannabis-related stocks surged in the final hours of trading on Wall Street.'
https://newfrontierdata.com/marijuana-insights/the-week-that-was-removal-of-pete-jeff-sessions-seen-as-boons-for-cannabis/


'Roughly half of survey respondents identified law enforcement as the main opposition group, specifically the Texas Sheriff’s Association (TSA). In testimony before the House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence, members of the TSA argued that legalizing marijuana would “send the wrong message” to youth about the harms of drug use and that legalization in other states has led to increased use among teens. The focus on risks of marijuana reform for youth is a common framing choice among prohibition supporters (see Ferraiolo 2014). Whereas prohibition was once justified by beliefs that marijuana itself was evil and marijuana use immoral, such arguments increasingly strain credibility. Realizing this, marijuana opponents have sought more realistic frames. The message that marijuana is a gateway to further delinquency for youth that harms their health and achievement has resonated with a larger audience than past arguments based solely on morality claims....The TSA represents an organized interest that favors the status quo, and it intends to fight to preserve that status quo'
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0043820017716683


'The ads, paid for by prohibitionist committee Healthy and Productive Michigan (HAPM), attempted to stoke fears about legalization, incorrectly claiming that the initiative would allow for “unlimited potency” cannabis products.'
https://www.marijuanamoment.net/tv-stations-pulled-anti-legalization-ads-ahead-of-midterm-marijuana-votes-advocates-say/


'Former Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-RI), co-founder of the anti-marijuana group Smart Approaches to Marijuana, spoke out against the legalization bill and sparred with lawmakers. At one point, he was asked whether he believes alcohol should be prohibited—and after hesitating to respond, he said he did not but that alcohol advertisements should be more tightly regulated.'
https://www.marijuanamoment.net/watch-new-jersey-lawmakers-debate-marijuana-legalization-ahead-of-critical-vote/


'Sabet's idea of replacing arrests with warnings, citations and small fines is a far cry, however, from what most drug reformers have in mind. Although he says SAM is still formulating its approach and aims for flexibility, the recommendations in the "model legislation" on the group's website read almost like a parody of bureaucratic overreach.

Low-level offenders—which SAM typically defines as someone caught smoking weed in public or carrying more than 10 grams of cannabis for personal use—could face a "mandatory assessment of problem drug use after the first citation." Those found to have a drug problem would be sent for treatment; those who do not could be sent to social services to address "other life factors" that might be contributing to drug use.'
https://www.crainsnewyork.com/features/slowing-legal-weed-freight-train


Once Mexico legalizes and starts producing its own high quality legal varieties of marijuana, multiple superhighways connecting the two countries may be a better option than a wall. Coming to think of it, demarcating land borders between countries wherever possible with marijuana varieties contributed equally by the countries concerned should be a global best practice. This should of course be in addition to the policy of mandatory ingestion of marijuana by all heads of state as a qualifying criteria for office. Legalize it worldwide!


'Bannon told POLITICO that his team is studying whether its wall could be constructed from the hemp-based building material hempcrete. “Do you understand the irony of using hempcrete to keep out marijuana?" Bannon said. The group has entered into a partnership with the Kansas-based America’s Hemp Academy to supply the material if it is selected, according to organizers.'
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/05/maga-border-private-wall-bannon-kobach-prince-1147210


'All of which raises the question: Why would the nation’s top public health official choose to publicize disinformation?

Whether it’s representative of an institutional bias in Washington, DC, or a warning of what’s to come from the Trump Administration, experts contacted by Leafly News couldn’t say for sure. Some called it yet another example of an “alternative”—that is, false—assertion from Team Trump.

“He has access to better statistics,” Sam Kamin, a professor of marijuana law and policy at the University of Denver, said of Adams’s tweet. “It’s like Donald Trump tweeting out what he just heard on Fox News rather than what he’s hearing from his intelligence services.”'
https://www.leafly.com/news/politics/the-us-surgeon-general-just-tweeted-what-about-cannabis


Overzealous bureaucrats standing against positive change come what may and insisting on implementing outdated and backward policies which have been rejected by the creators of the policies themselves. Like soldiers who don't want to leave the battlefield even though the war is over and the death count has been devastating on all sides..

'The INCB’s president, Dr. Viroj Sumyai, noted in the foreword to the report that the conventions allow only for the medical and scientific use of cannabis, noting:

“The legalization of the use of cannabis for nonmedical purposes in some countries represents a challenge to the universal implementation of the treaties, a challenge to public health and well-being, particularly among young people, and a challenge to the parties to the treaties.”'
https://mjbizdaily.com/incb-medical-cannabis-violate-treaties/


'Still, moral entrepreneurs like Anslinger and Sessions have a unique place: they occupy a bully pulpit that amplifies their moral positions, while attempting to strengthen the position of the bureaucracy they run. Of course, the media environment within which Sessions operates is very different, too. While Anslinger carefully cultivated the media’s coverage of marijuana, numerous sources offer different viewpoints on marijuana that potentially dilute Sessions’s rhetoric.'
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1536504217742387


The man doesn't like tea. So he says that I shouldn't be having it either...

'The man behind SAM is Kevin Sabet, a former advisor for the federal Office of National Drug Control Policy during the Bill Clinton, George Bush, and Barack Obama administrations. Sabet started SAM in 2013 with Patrick Kennedy, the son of the late Ted Kennedy and a former Rhode Island congressman. SAM “envisions a society where marijuana policies are aligned with the scientific understanding of marijuana’s harms, and the commercialization and normalization of marijuana are no more,” according the group’s website.'
https://cannabiswire.com/2018/10/03/an-anti-cannabis-crusader-ramps-up-for-the-midterms-and-beyond/


'Phillips has made it patently clear that he won’t design cakes that conflict with his religious views—namely his belief that being gay or transgender is at odds with Christian values—but that also apparently extends to “controlled substances like marijuana and alcohol,” according to the complaint.'
https://www.marijuanamoment.net/baker-who-denied-same-sex-couple-now-complaining-about-marijuana-themed-cake-requests/


Legalize the ganja. Prohibition of any kind including alcohol or ganja only plays into the hands of the black market. Cartels make huge money, the product gets adulterated and millions of the poor end up in prison or die while the 'elitists' remain almost completely unaffected. Prohibition does not work anywhere or for almost anything. Respect an individual's freedom of recreational choice...prohibition is coercive governance...

'“With all humility I can only say that opposition to prohibition, saying it interferes with personal choice is just elitist. By this yardstick, one could even talk about legalizing marijuana use, as is the practice in some parts of the West. But we have to understand that alcohol addiction hurts the poor and the marginalized the most. It is like choosing between life and livelihood on one hand and lifestyle on the other.”'
https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-tamilnadu/nittygritty-of-prohibition-debate/article8534675.ece


Targeting marijuana...AIIMS of all the people should know that marijuana especially in traces will not kill...propaganda...

'The blood and urine samples of the first-year medical student who was found in a semi-comatose state at the AIIMS auditorium on September 18 and is battling for life have revealed traces of cannabis, also known as marijuana.'

https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-newdelhi/marijuana-traces-in-blood-samples-of-aiims-student/article5158406.ece


Lying contented on the grass and gazing at the sky is not interesting or worthwhile according to some people who are supposedly experts on the functioning of the mind...poets, artists, astronomers, scientists, thinkers, philosophers, shepherds, climatologists, nature lovers, bird watchers, meditators to name a few - you are not doing anything interesting or worthwhile...join a de-addiction camp and make sure to get your head checked by a shrink...don't forget to pop the pills that you are given afterwards to get you buzzing around like a busy bee...

'Stating that a cannabis user would be content just lying on the grass and gazing at the sky without any motivation to something interesting or worthwhile, he says, the fact that tobacco and alcohol is legal does not warrant making cannabis legal even if India has a history of social sanction to it.'
https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-metroplus/out-of-joint/article4395349.ece